AN APOLOGY FOR POETRY

MODULE: 27

SIR PHILIP SIDNEY

DR. SUTANUKA GHOSH ROY

TARAKESWAR DEGREE COLLEGE

TARAKESWAR—HOOGHLY.

1.0 OBJECTIVE:

Our study material will tell us briefly about the life of Sir Phillip Sidney, one of the major poets

of the sixteenth century and in more detail about his chief work An Apology For Poetry.

1.1 GENERAL INTRODUCTION

Sir Philip Sidney (1554-1595) was a courtier,

soldier, statesman, scholar and a distinguished poet

of the sixteenth century. He lived during the

Elizabethan age, so was a contemporary of

Shakespeare. We should recall that what we call the

Elizabethan Age is really the English Renaissance.

It begins in Italy and makes it to England during the

age of Elizabeth. In the essay he both explores the

core concepts and answers to earlier criticism of

poetry. We shall first discuss how he praises poetry

for being the cradle of civilization, for being a

channel of divine power, for teaching as well as

delighting, and for combining and surpassing the

virtues of history and philosophy. We shall then

move on to show how he refutes the main

arguments made against poetry.

In order to have a total understanding of the text, we

need to travel back in time. It is not just today that

people have wondered if poetry is worthwhile. It has always had its critics. Like all critics before

him, Sidney knew that he would have to answer not only contemporary attacks but he always

had to answer Plato. Plato was always in the background, and was the raison d'etre. During

Sidney‟s time there was no standard model of English literary criticism. Sidney‟s predecessors in

the field of literary criticism suffered from a myopic vision. Critics like Wilson, Ascham or Elyot

cannot be regarded as full-fledged critics. Their myopic vision confined them to the discussion of

the formal aspects of literature only. Sidney could see much more clearly than his

contemporaries. He is the first critic of English literature and real criticism began in England

with Sir Philip Sidney. In this sense he is an innovator, who broke away from the early critical

tradition and created his own.

Chaucer had the critical spirit in him but it did not find the proper trajectory. In 1473,

Richard de Bury (1281-1345) published the original Latin version of the Philobiblon. It is a weak

attempt as it suffers from a narrow outlook. William Caxton ( c. 1422-91), the first literary icon

of fifteenth century England showed some critical significance in his prefaces to the books he

choose for printing. His critical observations are regarded as the first impressionistic

„appreciations‟ in the history of English literary criticism. Sir Thomas Elyot‟s ( c. 1490-1546)

The Book Named the Governor ( 1531) lacks the deep critical insight. Roger Ascham ( 1515-68)

in his Taxophilus ( 1545) strongly advocated the use of English, as he was a purist he totally

disapproved the introduction of foreign words into the English language. In Schoolmaster

(1570) he clearly shows his affinity with the misomousoi or „ poet haters‟ of the time. Thomas

Wilson‟s ( c. 1525-81) The Art of Rhetoric ( 1553) can be regarded as the first modern treatise on

English composition.

Sidney‟s An Apology For Poetry is a class of its own,

altogether different from these critics. It was first published

posthumously in 1595 in two separate yet more or less identical

editions by two printers. The one which was brought out by

William Ponosby was called The Defence of Poesie. An

Apologie for Poetrie is the title of the work brought out by

Henry Olney. Sidney was greatly influenced by the Italian

renaissance writers. We are to remember that before the

Renaissance the critical vision was shrouded in darkness.

Sidney took a bold step to emerge from this medieval darkness

into light. He wrote the first treatise on literary theory using

humanist concepts. One thing that we should remember about

Sidney's Apology; is that even though it is a brilliant work, it is

more synthetic than original. In other words, most of the ideas that he conveys in this defense,

have been said before by Aristotle, Horace and others. Yet what Sidney brings to it is an

incredible polish. He has selected, adapted from many sources in order to arrive at his own

conception of poetry.

In this unit we are going to learn:

∙● Sidney‟s Defence and Gosson‟s Abuse

● Sidney‟s Apology For Poetry

● Sidney‟s View of the Antiquity and Universality of Poetry

● Sidney‟s Definition of Poetry

● Poetry as Superior to History and Philosophy

● The Various Kinds of Poetry

● Four Chief Objections to Poetry

● Sidney‟s Review of English Poetry and Drama

[Type sidebar content. A sidebar is a standalone supplement to the main document. It is often aligned on the left or right of the

page, or located at the top or bottom. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the sidebar text box.

Type sidebar content. A sidebar is a standalone supplement to the main document. It is often aligned on the left or right of the

page, or located at the top or bottom. Use the Text Box Tools tab to change the formatting of the sidebar text box.]

nd Drama

● Sidney‟s View of Poetry.

1.2 HISTORICAL BACKGROUND

ThTThhThThe

The immediate cause of Sidney‟s writing the essay was Stephen Gosson‟s The Schoole of

Abuse (1579), which was unauthorizedly dedicated, to Sidney and questioned the morality of

poetry and other forms of literature. Apology was written in the sixteenth century renaissance

literary climate that was concerned about aesthetic problems regarding the object and purpose of

poetry itself. Thus unlike Thomas Lodge‟s Defence of Poetry (1580), Sidney‟s Apology is much

more than a reply to Gosson. He proceeds to give an argument for the value of poetry and its

social significance also.

Gosson was essentially guided or misguided by the spirit of sour Puritanism. He has

described his work as „a pleasant invective‟; however the readers have an unpleasant experience

while reading it. The general feeling is of coarseness, as the entire essay is full of claptrap

expressions----„poets are the whetstones of wit‟ …… „that wit is dearly brought. Where honey

and gall are mixed, it will be hard to sever the one from the other‟. When Gosson wrote this

essay he was just twenty-four, he wanted instant fame, instead he became infamous. He suffered

essentially from the Malvolio complex and spared none. His was a typical case of those „who

seek a praise by dispraising others‟.

Let us refer to the following lines from Sidney, which clearly states the occasion of his

work:

…….who ( I know not by what mischance) in these my not old years and idlest times, having

slipped into the title of a poet, am provoked to say something unto you in the defence of that my

unelected vocation, which if I handle with more good will than good reasons, bear with

me….And yet I must say that, as I have just cause to make a pitiful defence of poor poetry,

which from almost the highest estimation of learning is fallen to be the laughing-stock of

children, so have I need to bring some more available proofs, since the former is by no man

barred of his deserved credit, the silly latter hath had even the names of philosophers used to the

defacing of it, with great danger of civil war among the Muses. (1-2)

One thing which we should put clearly in our mind is that Sidney‟s outlook is a moral one..

At a glance Sidney‟s aesthetic principle may appear to be Horation, however he transcends

Horace‟s aim of teaching and delighting. He strongly emphasizes the ability of poetry to move

men towards perfection. He takes en route to Plato and creates a Neo-Platonic ideal world for the

poet. He advocates this ability of the poet to move men to more virtuous action. This essence of

Sidney‟s theory places poetry on the same pedestal which was formerly ascribed to scriptures.

The full title of Gosson‟s work is: „The School of Abuse, containing a pleasant invective against

poets, Pipers, Players, Jesters and such like Caterpillars of a Commonwealth; setting up the Flag

of Defiance to their mischievous exercise and overthrowing their Bulwarks by Profane Writers,

Natural reason and common experience; a discourse as pleasant for Gentleman that favour

learning, as profitable for all that will follow virtue’.

1.3 SIDNEY’S APOLOGY FOR POETRY

Nature never set forth earth in so rich tapestry as divers poets have done; neither with pleasant

rivers, fruitful trees, sweet smelling flowers, nor whatever else may make the too-much loved

earth more lovely; her world is brazen, the poets only deliver a golden ( 6).

Sidney in his Apology states that poetry alone transcends nature. Though he was

„provoked‟ by Gosson, (we have already noticed that in his own writings quoted above) Sidney‟s

Apology is more than a work of criticism, it is a remarkable piece of literature. The essay restores

our faith in poetry as well as in ourselves. He has not confined himself within narrow critical

thoughts, rather his clarity and elegance makes him stand tall above others. One of the main

tenets of sixteenth century Protestantism is that man is not virtuous and is incapable of doing any

good to himself or to the society at large. Sidney‟s essay is reflective of the humanistic

worldview. Thus he was much ahead of his times.

And that the poet hath that idea is manifest, by delivering them forth in such excellency as he

hath imagined them. Which delivering forth also is not wholly imaginative, as we are wont to say

by them that build castles in the air: but so far substantially it worketh…. (7).

Whereas the sixteenth century Protestantism thought otherwise Sidney reiterates his belief

in humanity and substantiated his point by arguing that the poet‟s creativeness is the highest

human faculty. .

…this purifying of wit, this enriching of memory, enabling of judgment, and enlarging of

conceits, which commonly we call learning, under what name so ever it comes forth, or to what

immediate end so ever it be directed, the final end is to lead and draw us to as high a perfection

as our degenerate souls, made worse by their clayey lodgings, can be capable of” (140).

1.4 SIDNEY’S VIEW OF THE ANTIQUITY AND UNIVERSALITY OF POETRYh

When the right virtuous Edward Wotton and I were at the Emperors court together, we gave

ourselves to learn horsemanship of John Pietro Pugliano, one that with great commendation had

the place of an esquire in his stable. And he, according to the fertileness of the Italian wit, did not

only afford us the demonstration of his practice, but sought to enrich our minds with the

contemplations therein which he thought most precious.(1).

This is how Sidney begins his essay, on a rather curious note we would say. Before

launching a defence of poetry, Sidney justified his stand by referring in a half-humorous manner

to a treatise on horseman-ship by Pietro Pugliano. If the art of horsemanship can deserve such an

eloquent eulogy and vindication, surely poetry has better claims for eulogy and vindication.

Sidney finds a just cause to plead a case for poetry since it has fallen from the highest estimation

of learning to be „the laughing stock of children.‟ The equerry was always busy blowing his own

trumpet. From Pugliano Sidney learnt this trick of magnifying his own vocation as well as

horsemanship. At first he is resolved to establish poetry as the mother of all knowledge. He is

concerned with the antiquity and universality of poetry. He goes on to establish the fact that

poetry is respected in all ages and in all countries, even in uncivilized countries.

Among the Romans a poet was called vates, which is as much as a diviner, forseer or

prophet (4)…let us see how the Greeks named it and how they deemed of it. The Greeks called

him a „poet‟ which name hath, as the most excellent, gone through other languages. It cometh of

this word, poiein, which is „ to make‟: wherein I know not whether by luck or wisdom, we

Englishmen have met with the Greeks in calling him a maker: which name, how high and

incomparable a title it is, I had rather were known by marking the scope of other sciences than by

my partial allegation ( 5-6).

According to Sidney all other human arts are subordinate to nature; poetry alone

transcends nature, since the poet is a maker. Shelley‟s Defence of Poetry is inspired by Sidney‟s

Apology For Poetry. In order to have a better understanding we can refer to Shelley‟s comment

in this context. He says “None deserves the name of Creator, but God and the poet‟. As God, the

creator, creates his own universe, the poet too has his own world. To attack poetry is to attack the

roots of culture, to attack poetry is to attack the universality of poetry itself.

1.5 SIDNEY’S DEFINITION OF POETRY

Poesy therefore is an art of imitation, for so Aristotle termeth it in his word mimesis, that is to

say, a representing, counterfeiting, or figuring forth-----to speak metaphorically, a speaking

picture----with this end, to teach and delight. (8).

In his definition of poetry he follows both Aristotle and Horace : „to teach and delight‟.

He gives emphasis to the didactic purpose of this Horation notion that poetry must teach or

delight, in order to encourage and inspire people to acquire knowledge and thus move out of

barbarism. Poetry is an art of „imitation‟ and its chief function is to teach and delight. Imitation

does not mean mere copying or a reproduction of facts. It means a representing or transmuting of

the real and actual, and sometimes creating something entirely new. In this context we should

remember the significant phrase „speaking picture‟. Both Plato as well as Aristotle has drawn

parallel between poetry and painting. In Ars Poetica Horace mentions it as ut picture poesis.

Taking the cue from Horace, Sidney speaks of poetry as the „speaking picture‟.

Sidney then goes on to classify different kinds of poetry-----sacred poetry, philosophical or

didactic poetry and the right kind of poetry. The poets who write sacred poetry, the teachers of

religion and prophets are essentially theologists, hence they have their own limitations. The

philosophical or didactic poets are restricted within their own boundaries as they are dependant

for their material on external sources. He draws special attention to this third group of poets. The

third group of poets are the „ real makers‟, as Shelley says, „ the unacknowledged legislators of

the world‟.

Sidney makes poetry free from any kind of external limitations---like metrical patterns.

..it is not rhyming and versing that maketh a poet----no more than a large gown maketh an

advocate (9).

Verse is the outer skin and not the flesh and blood of poetry. We should remember that

verse is just an ornament and not essential to poetry.

We should remember that rhyme and metre are not essential for poetry, but they harmonize the

language and help to the memory.

1.6 POETRY AS SUPERIOR TO HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY

In the next part of his essay Sidney looks closely at the roles of philosopher as well as

historian in relation to the poet. He argues that poetry is above both history and philosophy, as,

The philosopher therefore and the historian are they which would win the goal, the one by

precept, the other by example. But both, not having both, do both halt………Now doth the

peerless poet perform both: for whatsoever the philosopher saith should be done, he giveth a

perfect picture of it in some one by whom he presupposeth it was done, so as he couplet the

general notion with the particular example. (13).

In other words, Poetry is superior to the other two in teaching the essential human virtues. Even

if we consider poetry as an art or craft, following Aristotle‟s definition of poetry, it is superior to

all. Sidney believes that poetry can move men to better, more virtuous individuals, rather than

simply teaching. In the promotion of virtue, both philosophy and history play their individual

parts. Philosophy deals with its theoretical aspects and teaches virtue by precept whereas history

teaches practical virtue by drawing concrete examples from life. But poetry combines both

precepts and practical examples. Philosophy, being based on abstractions, cannot properly guide

the youth. On the other hand, the historian is tied to empirical facts. His example draws no

necessary consequence. Poetry gives perfect pictures of virtue which are far more effective than

the mere definitions of philosophy. It also gives imaginary examples which are more instructive

than the real examples of history. The reward of virtue and the punishment of vice is more

clearly shown in Poetry than in History. Poetry is superior to Philosophy in the sense that it has

the power to move and achieve virtuous action. It presents moral lessons in a very attractive

form. Things which in themselves are horrible as cruel battles, unnatural monsters, are made

pleasant in poetic imitation. Poet is, therefore, the monarch of all sciences.

Poetry is superior to philosophy: the poet gives a perfect picture. The poet is the right

philosopher. Poetry is more philosophical and superior to history.

1.7 THE VARIOUS KNDS OF POETRY

Sidney now focuses his attention to several kinds of poetry. Pastoral poetry, elegiac

poetry and satiric poetry, according to Sidney are all wholesome. The pastoral poetry treats of

the beauty of the simple life, and sometimes, of the miseries of the common people under Lords

and nobles. Elegiac poetry deals with the weakness of mankind and wretchedness of the world. It

evokes pity. Satiric poetry laughs at folly, and iambic poetry tries to unmask villainy. He lays

undue stress on the moral aspects of comedy. Comedy is an imitation of the common errors of

our life presented in a ridiculous manner. It helps men keeping away from such errors. Tragedy,

is replete with „sweet violence‟ and it makes us remain grounded when we realize that life is full

of uncertainties. The lyric which gives moral precepts and soars to the heavens in singing the

praises of the God, can never be displeasing. Nor can the epic or heroic poetry be disliked

because it inculcates virtue to the highest degree by portraying heroic and moral goodness in the

most effective manner. Sidney asserts that the heroical is „not only a kind, but the best and most

accomplished kind of poetry.‟

1.8 FOUR CHIEF OBJECTIONS TO POETRY

According to Sidney, Plato was not against poetry in general but he l

After the general discussion on poetry, Sidney now argues against specific critiques of

poetry. First---poetry is useless---a waste of time, second—poetry is deceptive the mother of all

lies, third—poetry is immoral—the nurse of abuse, fourth—Plato would have none of it and so

banished poets from his republic. In answer to the first charge, Sidney argues that to call poetry

useless is begging the question itself.

FOUR CHIEF OBJECTIONS TO POETRY:

1. Its uselessness

2. Its falsehood

3. Its corrupting effect

4. Plato‟s condemnation of poetry.

Now let us put it in simple words---the statement—that it is by denouncing the mere

prerequisite for the accusation---a poet intends to state the ( or a) truth, is itself invalid. Poetry is

not the falsest art, it is the truest form of art, as it does not actually pretend to factual truth. The

Astronomer, the Geometrician, the historian, and others, all make false statements .But while a

poet is not a liar, the immorality of poetry is actually its abuse. So what he presents is not fact but

fiction embodying truth of an ideal kind. If rightly used, poetry does most good. In answer to the

effeminizing effect, Sidney says that it is the stock abuse against all learning. Poetry alone has

the ability to rouse man to virtuous action. The fourth and last accusation against poetry is

perhaps the greatest treason according to Sidney. He thinks Plato was against the wrong opinions

of the gods and atheism which poetry in ancient times talked of. According to Sidney, Plato was

not against poetry in general but he leveled his charges against a particular kind of poetry which

would create a harmful effect on human minds and society in general. Plato had warned against

the abuse of poetry as he with all reverence described the poet in Ion as

A light and winged and holy thing. ( Ion ,157).

So as Plato, banishing the abuse, not the thing, not banishing it, but giving due honour unto it,

shall be our patron and not our adversary. (36).

1.9 SIDNEY’S REVIEW OF ENGLISH POETRY AND DRAMA

Sidney now reviews the pathetic state of poetry in England. He uses the term poetry in its

original Greek sense, which denotes not only poetry but all sorts of imaginative literature like

drama. He sadly recounts England‟s step motherly attitude towards the poets of his time who

unfortunately are ranked with the mountebanks. He strikes at the root cause of this poetical

decadence----the tendency of the poets to write uninspired writing---invita Minerva. He repeats

the old tagline---A poet is born and not made:

Poesy must not be drawn by the ears; it must be gently led, or rather it must lead ( 39).

A threesome combination of art, imitation and exercise goes on to make poetry successful.

According to Sidney, since Chaucer there are few good poems in England. He mentions

Chaucer‟s Troilus and Criseyde, but sadly leaves out his magnum opus, The Canterbury Tales.

He mentions Sackville, Surrey and Spenser. Strangely, strangely he ignores Langland‟s Piers

Plowman or Tottel‟s Miscellany.

However this doomed state of drama is somehow redeemed by Gorboduc though this play

lacks the unities of time and place. Sidney prescribes that a tragedy should be tied to the laws of

poetry and not of history. A dramatist should have liberty to frame the history to his own tragical

convenience. Furthermore Sidney analyses that tragedy is not always maintained in a well-raised

admiration (42).

Comedy on the other hand degenerates into something farcical or immoral. Often laughter in

comedy is confused with pleasure. Sidney stresses that comedy should aim at delightful teaching

and not vulgar amusement.

Neither is he hopeful about English lyric poetry which has undergone degeneration and

has become tame and artificial during this age. The affected eloquence has turned too

fashionable. The metaphors are too farfetched. In the next part of the essay he praises the English

language as it is the most suitable for poetry. It is adaptable both to ancient and modern systems

of versification. Sidney‟s bold view of English language has successfully paved its way for

future development. He comes to a closure with a peroration wherein he sums up the claims of

poetry. All the charges laid against it are false and baseless. He ends with a request that poetry

should never ever be degraded. Moreover the contemporary poets were inferior men with

mercenary motives. They lacked the genuine love for poetry. They also lacked the training and

practice that is necessary to write successful poetry. He blesses people who love poetry and

threatens people who are allergic to poetry in general. He wrote the essay in a light hearted

manner. He gives an adequate answer to the puritan approach of his age. The end too is

humourous enough to make us fall in love with poetry once more and behold Sidney as the first

critic!

LET US SUM UP:

● Sidney‟s Apology For Poetry is more than a work of criticism, it is a work of literature.

● Poetry is the mother of all knowledge.

● Poetry alone transcends nature.

● Plato is not against poetry, he warned against the abuse of poetry.

QUESTIONS:

Answer the following questions: (15 marks).

1. Discuss An Apology for Poetrie as a typical specimen of Renaissance criticism.

2. Discuss Sidney‟s contribution as a critic. Can he be called the father of English

criticism?.

3. How did Sidney react to Stephen Gosson‟s School of Abuse? Why was it necessary for

Sidney to defend poetry?

4. Discuss the limitations of Sidney‟s criticism.

5. Write an essay on Sidney‟s view of poetry. What is the most important function of

poetry? Is Sidney‟s view original?

6. Write an essay on Sidney the „classicist‟. Do you detect any „romantic traits‟ in him?

7. Sidney is indebted to Greek and Latin critics. Discuss.

8. What was the impact of Italian criticism on Sidney?

9. Discuss Sidney‟s arguments for the superiority of poetry to history and philosophy.

10. Is verse essential to poetry? Discuss Sidney‟s standpoint.

Answer the following questions: (7 marks).

1. What are the principal subdivisions of poetry postulated by Sidney?

2. How does Sidney refute the major objections leveled against poetry in his own day?

3. Discuss Sidney‟s view regarding the dramatic unities. Comment on Sidney‟s review

of tragicomedy.

4. Analyse Sidney‟s review of English poetical literature.

5. Comment on Sidney‟s review of English dramatic literature.

6. Enumerate Sidney‟s view of the true nature of tragedy.

7. Enumerate Sidney‟s view of the state of English tragedy in his time.

8. What are the observations of Sidney on the true nature of comedy?

9. Do you agree with Sidney‟s view about the state of English comedy in his time?

10. Summarise Sidney‟s observations on the diction of English poetry.

Answer the following questions (4 marks).

1. Explain. “Nature never set forth the earth in so rich tapestry divers poets have

done…Her world is brazen, the poets only deliver a golden”.

2. “Poesy therefore is an art of imitation……with this end, to teach and delight.” Is

poetry an art of imitation?

3 “……his [ the historian‟s] example draweth no necessary consequence.” Explain.

4. Examine “…the Comedy is an imitation of the common errors of our life”.

5. Explain. “….the poet only bringeth his own stuff, and doth not learn a conceit out

of a matter, but maketh matter for a conceit.”

6. Do you agree with Sidney‟s view that “…..Now for the poet, he nothing affirms,

and therefore never lieth.”

7. “..our erected wit maketh us know what perfection is, and yet our infected will

keepeth us from reaching unto it.” How does Sidney define wit?

8. Comment. “….poesy must not be drawn by the ears; it must be gently led, or rather

it must lead.”

9. What is Sidney‟s view about the English language?

10. Explain. “…..where the whole tract of a comedy should be full of delight, as the

tragedy should be still maintained in a well-raised admiration.”

MULTIMEDIA LINKS TO EXPLAIN THE TEXT:

Sources:

 http://www.enotes.com/topics/defence-poesie

 http://www.poetryfoundation.org/bio/philip-sidney

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/An_Apology_for_Poetry

 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Philip_Sidney