1
Using Music to Teach Phonological Awareness
by
Sophia Ann Thompson
A thesis submitted to the faculty of
Wittenberg University
In partial fulfillment of the requirements for
DEPARTMENTAL HONORS IN EDUCATION AND UNIVERSITY HONORS
Wittenberg University
May 2024
2
Abstract
In this study, I analyzed the ways music can teach phonological awareness to contribute
to student engagement and literacy achievement. In recent years, literacy achievement has fallen
short. With phonological awareness skills contributing to the success of a reader, an
improvement needs to be found. Through the completion of teacher interviews and assessing the
different outcomes between phonological awareness lessons with and without music, I was able
to determine that music has the capability to improve a students literacy skills. These findings
contribute to the field of education by highlighting the need for supplemental instruction and the
power that music integration into core content areas can have for students. This study provides
insights for future research that can be done in this field to achieve more positive educational
outcomes.
3
Contents
Using Music to Teach Phonological Awareness .................................................................................1
Abstract ............................................................................................................................................2
Chapter One .....................................................................................................................................4
Introduction......................................................................................................................................4
Chapter Two .....................................................................................................................................6
Literature Review .............................................................................................................................6
Music in Education .......................................................................................................................6
Phonological Awareness ................................................................................................................8
Reading Success and Phonological Awareness ............................................................................9
Typical Phonological Awareness Instruction ............................................................................. 10
Current State of Literacy Achievement ...................................................................................... 11
Music and Phonological Awareness ............................................................................................. 13
Chapter Three ................................................................................................................................ 16
Method ........................................................................................................................................... 16
Background................................................................................................................................. 16
Teacher interviews and beliefs on music integration ................................................................... 17
Lesson Plans ................................................................................................................................ 18
Chapter Four .................................................................................................................................. 21
Results ............................................................................................................................................ 21
Teacher Interviews ...................................................................................................................... 21
Lesson Observations.................................................................................................................... 26
Chapter Five ................................................................................................................................... 31
Discussion ....................................................................................................................................... 31
Teacher Interviews ...................................................................................................................... 31
Consonant Blend Lessons ............................................................................................................ 33
Limitations .................................................................................................................................. 35
Future Research .......................................................................................................................... 36
References....................................................................................................................................... 37
4
Chapter One
Introduction
Literacy is a huge part of a child’s education. From the very first year that they are in school,
they are learning important literacy skills. Learning these skills is a key indicator of someone’s
ability to be literate as they get older. A huge piece of this puzzle is phonological awareness. This
is the ability to hear, identify, and manipulate the sounds of spoken language (Scarborough,
2002). This is a critical skill that everyone needs to develop in elementary school. In recent
years, literacy achievement has decreased and new ways to teach skills may be worth exploring
to try and close the gap. A way that this can be done is through music. Music within education
has typically been a “special” that students go to once a week for a short period of time.
Research has proven that music is able to enhance one’s learning of other skills such as
phonological awareness (Bolduc, 2009; Hurwitz et. al, 1975; Wiggins, 2007). The effects of
incorporating music intentionally into the general education classroom could help close the gap
in literacy achievement for the state of Ohio.
Given the gap in literacy achievement, this study aimed to analyze whether or not music
had an effect on the learning of phonological awareness skills in relation to academic
performance and engagement. I conducted my study at a small rural school in Ohio. The first
part of my study consisted of interviews with both grade-level teachers and the music teacher at
the school to get an idea of what is already in place for phonological awareness instruction and
music integration. Then, I conducted a series of lessons in a second-grade classroom on an
important phonological awareness skill, consonant blends. Some of these lessons used music as
an aid to support the students’ acquisition of knowledge and the other lessons did not use music.
5
The results were qualitatively and quantitatively analyzed to see the effects that music has on
instruction.
I chose to study this topic because of how important phonological awareness is to student
literacy achievement. There is also a natural connection between both phonological awareness
and music. Some phonological awareness skills that we see frequently in music are alliteration
and rhyming. Alliteration is when the same consonant sound is present in multiple words that are
near each other like in the common phrase, “Sally sold seashells by the seashore.” (Invernizzi et.
al, 2023). Rhyming occurs when words have the same middle and ending sound. For example,
cat, bat, and hat (Invernizzi et. al, 2023). Because of this connection, it could potentially be more
relevant to students, engage students, and help to make their learning more concrete. Outside of
these skills, there are multiple other phonological awareness skills that are important to literacy
success in students that could be taught using music. I aimed to discover whether or not music
could be used as a tool to make gains in the literacy achievement gap that is currently present.
The primary hypothesis of this study was that using music in phonological awareness instruction
would result in increased student engagement and achievement.
6
Chapter Two
Literature Review
In this study, I wanted to identify whether or not music was beneficial in classrooms
while teaching phonological awareness skills. Although many teachers may be using music in
their classroom, there is very limited data available on specific instructional practices for
teaching phonological awareness using music which shows the importance of analyzing the two
domains separately. In this chapter, I will go through three different categories relevant to the
study. First, there will be background knowledge given on the current state of music in the
schools both within and outside of the music classroom. Then, I will discuss the importance of
phonological awareness on early literacy skills. Lastly, I will focus on the intersection of music
and phonological awareness instruction.
Music in Education
Typically, we see music offered to elementary students once a week that students attend
for a small amount of time. This is typically around thirty minutes. It is separate from the general
education classroom and typically focuses on music skills such as singing or playing an
instrument. The music teacher typically teaches a wide range of grades in elementary school and
covers multiple areas. This is also seen in the Ohio Standards for music. The standards begin as
very basic musical ideas such as K.1.CR, which states that students experience a wide variety of
vocal and instrumental sounds and then progresses to 1.3.CR where students compose simple
rhythms (Ohio Fine Arts Learning Standards, 2022). As the students increase in age, the music
teachers typically teach one discipline. This is mostly seen in middle school and high school
when they teach band, choir, or orchestra. These standards are more complex and consist of
students composing melodies using accompaniment and specific forms of notation. In
7
elementary music, standards are general music and middle and high school standards are more
specific.
In a research study done by Ling-Yu Liza Lee (2009), it was found that when combining
music into other skills, students were more motivated to learn the material. In this particular
study, the researcher taught three- to four-year-olds four different songs throughout a twenty-
four-week period with two lessons a week that focused on learning vocabulary in the English
language. Lee recognized how important language and communication skills are to the age group
of students she was focused on and incorporated music in order to teach these skills. Not only are
these students learning their native language, but Lee used music to teach the concepts in a
foreign language, in this case English. In this study, they found that this benefitted the students in
multiple ways. Students were learning English and vocabulary better with music. Some
vocabulary that researchers focused on were high and low, soft and loud, stop and go, and fast
and slow. Students made connections from the songs to the English language. Music forms a
bridge for students between the two hemispheres of their brain and allows them to work together
to promote complex thinking (Lee, 2009). Students in this study were connecting their
knowledge of music and the sounds to their newfound knowledge of the English vocabulary and
language.
In another study, researchers investigated the effect that music has on students’ emotional
development (Blasco-Magraner et. al, 2021). Emotional development is important to students
and includes their ability to communicate and collaborate with those around them. In traditional
school settings, students are exposed to these opportunities daily which makes emotional
development crucial. In this study, researchers analyzed several areas of music used in school.
They found that students who were exposed to music were better at recognizing their emotions.
8
They found the same results in emotional regulation. When looking at the effect on school tasks,
researchers found that when video clips and background music were used, students had a more
positive mood. These students subsequently performed better on reasoning activities, had higher
levels of creativity, and higher motivation.
Phonological Awareness
Phonological awareness refers broadly to the many different skills that involve the ability
to manipulate and hear the sounds of spoken words (Scarborough, 2002). Many skills need to be
acquired for students to have phonological awareness. Students need to know that an individual
sound in a word is called a phoneme. Within phonological awareness, students are manipulating
and hearing these sounds. These sounds do not always directly correlate the number of letters in
the word they may be writing. For example, the word ‘chip’ has four letters but only three
phonemes because CH has two letters to represent one phoneme. As students progress forward in
their knowledge of phonemes and graphemes, the written representation of a sound, they will be
able to decode, or read, with more accuracy and encode, or spell, with more accuracy.
Phonological awareness encompasses many different skills such as rhyming, alliteration,
segmentation, syllables, deletion, isolation of phonemes, and blending. Phonological awareness
is important to reading success and is a skill that begins to develop early in a child’s life and
develops into early adulthood (National Reading Panel, 2002).
Emergent Literacy is the first stage of literacy development. Emergent literacy skills are
skills that students start to develop from their first interactions with print. These skills are pre-
reading skills that prepare the student for further skills that are essential to becoming literate.
Phonological awareness, print concepts, alphabet knowledge, and literate language are all part of
emergent literacy (Eccles et. al., 2021). Phonological awareness is an integral part of emergent
9
literacy and continues to develop throughout elementary school. The skills developed here are
predecessors of a successful reader. Students’ ability to blend words together when given
phonemes or identify the number of phonemes in a word relies heavily on the knowledge that
they developed during emergent literacy. During that time, students were exposed to print and
letters that they are now seeing used in the words around them. This permits them to form
connections between graphemes and phonemes. This begins as larger segments of sounds such as
words and syllables and further breaks down into individual phonemes (Whitehurst & Lonigan,
2001). Throughout emergent literacy, students are learning the foundation of reading success that
will continue to develop.
Reading Success and Phonological Awareness
The science of reading consists of decades worth of research on the importance of
foundational skills to develop into successful readers. In a study done by Lea and Ely Kozminsky
(1995), they found that early phonological awareness instruction in kindergarten had effects on the
reading success of third graders. In the study, half of the students received a phonological
awareness program while the other students maintained the typical instructional methods being
offered by the school. They were tested in kindergarten and first grade for phonological awareness
skills using a standard phonological awareness screener (PAT). This assessment looks at many
skills under the umbrella of phonological awareness such as rhyme detection, sentence
segmentation, syllable synthesis, syllable segmentation, phoneme isolation, phoneme deletion,
phoneme segmentation, and phoneme synthesis. In each of these tasks, the average score for the
experimental group was higher than those of the control group. The two most notable tasks were
those of phoneme deletion and isolation. In deletion tasks, the experimental group was averaging
a 1.50 and the control group a 0.67. In isolation, the experimental group averaged 2.41 while the
10
control group averaged 1.07. Researchers pointed out that these two skills explained 70% of the
comprehension scores they analyzed later. Overall, the PAT scores between the two groups had a
difference of nearly seven points with the group receiving phonological awareness instruction
showing more success (Kozminsky & Kozminsky, 1995).
In the same study, the researchers analyzed the comprehension abilities of the two sets of
students. Comprehension is the ability to recall what they have read in a text. This is important
because understanding what they have read will allow them to use their new knowledge elsewhere.
Before they can read, they need the basic knowledge of words and their parts. This is what
phonological awareness instruction leads them to. In the study, they found a significant difference
in the control group and experimental group in comprehension of third grade texts. After their
kindergarten year, students took the comprehension test. The experimental group who received the
phonological awareness instruction scored an average of 20.0 while the control group scored an
average of 15.33. In third grade, the same students were given the same comprehension
assessment. The experimental group scored an average of 40.60 and the control group scored an
average of 36.93 (Kozminsky & Kozminsky, 1995). These results show that the group who
received phonological awareness instruction in kindergarten was now able to comprehend the texts
better than the other group. The effects of instruction in kindergarten were still showing a
difference two years later. The students who had higher phonological awareness could in turn read
better and comprehend text better as they got older.
Typical Phonological Awareness Instruction
Phonological awareness instruction needs to occur explicitly in order for students to
begin thinking about individual phonemes more intentionally (Scarborough, 2022). Although
many students understand the concept of syllables, rhyming, and alliteration, they need explicit
11
instruction from a teacher. This will assist in their development of phonological awareness and
their ability to read. Special education professors Chard and Dickinson (1999) analyzed the
continuum of phonological awareness instruction given the complexity of skills. Students
progress in complexity in this order: rhyming, sentence segmentation, syllable segmentation and
blending, onset-rime segmentation and blending, and finally blending and segmenting individual
phonemes. They also give guidance on how to teach different levels of ability within those tasks.
While all students may be working on rhyming, some may be ready for rhyming in multi syllable
words, while others are focusing on one syllable words. Chard and Dickinson state that
phonological awareness instruction could begin as early as age four (1999). Instruction across the
ages may look different as they get more complex but should be engaging and age appropriate.
Some strategies include using colorful picture cards, games, props, etc. Chard and Dickonson
conclude their research by outlining that phonological awareness instruction has the ability to
help fill gaps for students who have reading disabilities (1999).
Current State of Literacy Achievement
The state of Ohio publishes a state report card each year outlining the achievement of
schools across the state. Looking at these results helps gain a sense of the learning that is
occurring and the students’ knowledge. Although the report card reports many different subjects,
I chose to first look at the early literacy component K-3 as this is when phonological awareness
instruction is most prominent. The state of Ohio scored at a 30.6% achievement rate. This
percentage is further broken down into three categories: proficiency in third grade reading,
promotion to fourth grade, and improving K-3 literacy. The third category, improving K-3
literacy, was the only category counted across the state and was 30.6%. This means that 30.6% of
students in grades K-3 were improving and making gains in that year that were previously
12
behind the expected norms for the grade level. They look at the students’ achievement in fall of
2021, 2022, and the 2022-’23 state test. In the fall of 2022, 44.5% of kindergarten students,
29.7% of first grade students, and 27.6% of second grade students were not on track. Out of
these, only 30% of them improved their literacy skills throughout the year (Ohio State Report
Card, 2023).
The above data highlights the need for supplemental literacy instruction. With that many
students performing behind the grade level norms and only a small percentage of them coming
back on track after a years’ worth of typical instruction, something extra is necessary. The state of
Ohio recognizes the need and has written a guide to improve literacy achievement throughout the
state. One component outlines the need for multi-tiered support school wide to meet the needs of
every student. It is focused on growth and improvement. Another component is to provide
educators with professional learning in the science of reading to further their knowledge on
instructional strategies for their students. Many of these focused on the theory of the Simple View
of Reading which breaks down the three main parts of reading and puts it into an equation. The
first piece is word reading or decoding, which is the students ability to read the words on the page
correctly. It then works with the second piece, language comprehension, which is a student’s ability
to understand spoken language put together to form meaning. When both word reading and
language comprehension are high, the students’ reading comprehension is subsequently high as
well. This is often written as word knowledge multiplied by language comprehension equals
reading comprehension (Gough & Tumner). The Department of Education takes this equation and
expands on each part to outline the importance that a student develops each. Furthermore, it
supports students’ varying needs by differentiating each component to fit the student. The state of
Ohio aims to use data-driven decision-making through engagement in the improvement process,
13
ensure that plans to improve are meaningful, evidence-based, and align to the literacy plan, support
the implementation of practices, and provide financial assistance for these efforts (Ohio
Department of Education, 2020). Through the outlined plan, The Ohio Department of Education
hopes to see literacy achievement in Ohio on the rise in the coming years.
Music and Phonological Awareness
Music and literacy share multiple elements in common and have an important role to the
emergent reader as noted by Donna Gwynn Wiggins (2007). Both music and learning to read
depend on the student hearing the difference in sounds and shapes of symbols. They are also both
read left to right. Aside from these, Wiggins points out that other parallels are phonological
awareness, phonemic awareness, vocabulary, and fluency. Wiggins studied a group of
preschoolers during a literacy lesson. The preschoolers were engaged in a literacy lesson that
integrated music. Students read a book and sang along as the book progressed. Students were
extremely energetic and were helping the teacher finish repeating phrases to show their recall of
the material. Then, students completed a matching exercise and sang the song through more
times where they acted out the story and used musical instruments. Wiggins related this lesson to
both music standards as well as the literacy standards to illustrate the connection. In the music
standards, students are to use their voices expressively, sing simple songs, experiment with
instruments, and demonstrate awareness of the elements of music (Ohio Fine Arts Standards,
2022). In the National Association for the Education of Young Children (NAEYC) language and
communication standards, students are to expand their vocabulary, sing simple songs, talk in
front of a group, and relate vocabulary to their own experiences (NAEYC Standards, 2005). In
this lesson, we see the connection of the two sets of standards by seeing students singing simple
songs paired with a book, both of which assist in the expansion of their vocabulary. Students are
14
also being exposed to print which will help develop the concept of print which is an emergent
literacy skill. In a short mini-lesson, Wiggins identified multiple connections that music has to
literacy for preschool students.
Music can be used to teach a wide variety of ideas in the classroom, but there has been
success in integrating music to teach phonological awareness skills specifically. Jonathan Bolduc
(2009) studied the effect of music training programs on the development of phonological
awareness skills in kindergartners. The control group used the currently adopted program while
the experimental group participated in an adapted version of the music program that aimed to
increase interest in reading and writing through music. Before undergoing any musical training,
students took a pretest and then retook the test after the training was completed. The three
phonological awareness skills that were assessed were syllable identification, rhyme
identification, and phoneme identification. It was found that the experimental group developed
stronger phonological awareness skills according to the assessment results. In phoneme
identification tasks, the control group improved by 10% and the experimental group improved by
23.4%. For syllable identification, the control group improved by 12.6% and the experimental
group improved by 32.5%. For rhyme identification, the control group improved by 11.1% and
the experimental group improved by 30.5%. Although both the control group and experimental
group had improved phonological awareness skills, the experimental group improved their
average score more with the adapted musical program.
Another study focused on the non-musical effects that a music program had on first grade
students (Hurwitz et. al, 1975). The researchers had two separate groups of first grade students.
They were each at different schools and were taught using different musical programs. The
experimental group was taught using the Kodaly music program. The reading abilities of the
15
students were tested throughout the study. The students were tested at the beginning of first
grade, end of first grade, and the end of second grade. At the beginning of first grade, there were
no significant differences. At the end of first grade, the control group scored a 72.3 on the
achievement test and the experimental group scored significantly higher with an 87.9. Then, a
year later the students were tested one final time. The experimental group averaged 90.2 and the
control group 83.5. This again shows a significant difference and the continuation of the effects
of the program on students’ reading abilities. Not only did the experimental group’s academic
achievement improve, but researchers notated that the students had an increase in motivation and
engagement in the material when the Kodaly program was being used in the first-grade
classroom.
Phonological awareness is important to the literacy achievement of students. Reading
scores are low and need to improve. Prior studies show that there is a link between music and
reading. Research on the topic is currently very limited. We need to continue to explore how
music can improve a child’s phonological awareness skills to improve their engagement and
achievement. Next, I will review the methodology for my current study.
16
Chapter Three
Method
This chapter outlines the methodology that I used to analyze how music integration
during phonological awareness instruction improves student engagement and achievement. In
my research, I utilized teacher interviews of the school across a variety of grades to gauge how
music was currently being integrated. I also taught targeted phonological awareness lessons on
consonant blends with and without music. This methodology offers a comprehensive approach to
understanding the impact music has in the classroom.
Background
I completed my research and interviews in a Midwest Ohio town. The school I was in is a
rural school with a population of almost 900 students and a teacher-student ratio of 1 to 21. Over
half of the teachers have been evaluated as accomplished and 41.3% are considered skilled. No
teachers have been evaluated as ineffective. Around ninety percent of students are white/non-
Hispanic. The other 10% of students are multiracial, Hispanic, or black. Many students, around
350, are economically disadvantaged and the school qualifies for title I funds. With this funding,
48% of students receive free or reduced lunch.
I will now look at the Ohio state report card for the school district I was completing my
research in. I chose to look at this data because it pulls a lot of information from the school’s
performance throughout the previous year. The report card reports a lot of data on achievement,
but I specifically looked at the early literacy component as this is the grade bands and content
that I am focusing my research on. The early literacy component measures the schools
effectiveness in reading and literacy supports in grades K-3. This district was rated as 83.3%
17
overall, and this score is further broken down into three additional categories. Proficiency in
third grade is 72.2% and is the number of students who scored proficient on the state English
test. In order to qualify in this measure, students had to score a 50 or higher. The second
component is promotion to fourth grade and 100% of students were promoted. The final
component tracks the reading improvement that occurs in grades K-3 for students who have
previously been off track but are back on track. This measure uses fall reading diagnostics as
well as the state tests but was not reported (Ohio State Report Card, 2023). Another area of the
school report card is the gap closing. This school was rated a four out of five stars which exceeds
state standards in closing educational gaps. This measure is evaluated to show how well students
are meeting performance expectations in different subjects. In English Language Arts, the
students’ performance goal was 80.5 and they reached 85. For English Language Arts growth, the
school fell by 2.3 points. The reason for the school’s growth decreasing is because in the
previous year the school had more growth in early literacy. Although students were improving it
was not as much as they had previously shown improvement for.
Teacher interviews and beliefs on music integration
In order to gather more information on what teachers currently do to integrate music into
their classroom as well as their personal beliefs on the idea of using music to teach phonological
awareness skills, I conducted interviews with general education teachers. The teachers that I
conducted interviews with were three general education teachers and the music teacher. These
teachers teach kindergarten, second grade, and third grade. I chose these grades because
kindergarten is a grade where students learn many foundational phonological awareness skills. I
chose second grade because I was teaching the lessons here and it is another large year for
growth. Lastly, I chose third grade because of the third grade reading guarantee and wanted to
18
see how the teacher in third grade taught phonological awareness skills. I also interviewed the
music teacher who teaches grades kindergarten through sixth. During the brief interview, I asked
a series of questions related to their beliefs and use of music in the classroom. The questions that
I asked the general education teachers and the music teacher differed. This is because the
standards for the general education teachers and the music teachers are different. I was interested
in seeing how much integration of the two was done in both areas. The questions I asked the
general education teachers focused on the strategies they find effective in their classroom for the
teaching of phonological awareness skills and how they were using music. For a full list of
questions, see appendix A. The questions that I asked the music teacher consisted of questions
regarding engagement in her classroom as well as how she is able to assist general education
teachers in integrating music into their classrooms. The full list of questions for the music
teacher are in Appendix B. After I taught the series of lessons on consonant blends with and
without music, I asked the second-grade teacher another set of questions to gauge her thoughts
on student engagement and use of music. These questions can be found in Appendix C.
By completing these interviews, I was able to gather a sense of how music was or was not
used in this elementary school. Gaining perspective from a wide range of grade levels and the
music discipline provided unique perspectives because they are instructing different aged
students who are learning different skills related to phonological awareness.
Lesson Plans
In the second-grade classroom, I implemented a total of four different lessons centered
around consonant blends. Consonant blends are when two to three consonants are right next to
each other in a word, and each give their own sound (Invernizzi et. al, 2023). Examples of blends
in a word include the bl in blend, sl in slip, and cr in crate. These relate to phonological
19
awareness because students need to hear the two consonants and how they seamlessly slide from
one to the other in the word. As they hear these consonant sounds, they can then write the words
or recognize the word when spoken aloud. I chose this skill because this group of second grade
students were completing a review of the subject after the grade level teachers saw there was a
gap in the students knowledge of blends. Two of these lessons incorporated music within them
while the other two did not use music. They were taught in two segments, each taking two days.
They occurred in back-to-back weeks. The first lesson of each segment did not incorporate music
and the second of each included brief exposures to music through YouTube that supplemented
the teaching of the blend. These lessons all began with their typical phonological awareness
instruction – Heggerty. Heggerty is a curriculum that provides students a short daily lesson on
phonological awareness skills (Heggerty, 2020). Through Heggerty, students practice necessary
phonological awareness skills that will help them become successful readers. These skills include
segmentation of words into phonemes, blending phonemes to form a word, identifying the
medial vowel in a word, rhyming, counting the sounds in a word compared to letters, and more
phonological awareness skills such as consonant blends and digraphs (Heggerty, 2020). The two
weeks when the lessons were implemented consisted mostly of words with blends in them
through each activity. It gave a segue into the lesson on the blend of that day. After Heggerty,
students would be asked the sounds of the letters in the blends and then the sound together. I
would then ask students to raise their hands and give examples of words they know with that
blend. Then, students would complete a worksheet about the specific blend. An example of these
worksheets can be found in appendix D. On the two days with music, before we discussed the
blend and gave examples, students would watch and listen to the short instructional music video.
These songs were carefully picked to have a catchy tune that students could easily pick up on
20
and participate in throughout the song as well as remember after the song is no longer being
played. The links to these videos can be found in Appendix E.
The worksheets for each lesson all followed the same structure. The first page consisted
of nine pictures. I would read aloud the words that these pictures depicted and ask students to
circle the picture if it has the blend and cross it off if it does not have the blend. The reason for
me reading it to them is because pictures can be subjective as to what their representation is.
Phonological awareness is also based on the students’ ability to recognize sounds in spoken
language, so I wanted to see their performance on an auditory exercise. On the back side of the
sheet, there were printed words and students were asked to circle the words that have the daily
bend and underline the blend. This side of the sheet assesses if students were able to recognize
the blend in printed words. This tells me that when they come across a word in a story with the
blend, they will know how to begin sounding the word out.
21
Chapter Four
Results
In this chapter I will report the results of my study to answer the question on if music has
an effect on engagement and student achievement in phonological awareness instruction. The
results will be in two parts. The first part will be the teacher interviews on their current
phonological awareness instruction and their beliefs on integrating music. I will be summarizing
the interviews and the answers that I received from them. The second part consists of results
from the series of lessons taught on consonant blends to the class of second graders. These
lessons will be summarized and focused on their achievement on the worksheet as well as their
participation and engagement throughout the entirety of the lessons.
Teacher Interviews
At this particular school, the music teacher, Mrs. Emigh, teaches kindergarten through
sixth grade music. She sees students twice every six school days for forty minutes. She explained
to me that most all of the students are engaged when they are in music class. She attributes this to
the pacing of the activities being fast as well as the students getting to use their whole body to
participate. Mrs. Emigh believes that if there is a way for music to be included in the general
education classroom that it should be done because it offers the students another way to learn.
Mrs. Emigh is available to teachers if they have any questions or need support in using music in
their classroom. After talking to the teacher to see what their needs are, she would offer help in
any way that she is able. This could range from offering resources she knows or making a
recording of the music that they need. Because students only go to music class twice every six
days, she has difficulty incorporating general education skills into her lesson plans. Mrs. Emigh
has been teaching for many years and used to teach a unit on the Underground Railroad when
22
that grade was learning it, but she did not have enough time to get to everything, so it had to be
cut out. She does, however, incorporate classroom skills within her lessons when the opportunity
arises and is relevant to the music content. For example, she talks about syllables when
transferring lyrics to notated rhythms. She has also called upon students knowledge of fractions
to help them understand the math behind rhythms and their names. She explained that with the
demand of the music content standards as well as preparing for performances, there is just not
enough time to “take deep dives” into full unit lessons on classroom skills.
I interviewed Ms. Miser at the school I completed my research in to get a perspective on
music in her kindergarten classroom. Currently, she uses Heggerty, Visual Phonics, and Core
Knowledge Language Arts Skills (CKLA) to teach phonological awareness. She likes these
curricula because they use a combination of visual and kinesthetic approaches to learn early
literacy skills. In Heggerty and CKLA, students often sing nursery rhymes with the goal of
identifying the rhyming words in them. She explains that for both Heggerty and Visual Phonics,
students manipulate sounds within words by using their hands and arms. Outside of these
curricula, Ms. Miser uses Play-Doh and sand for students to practice writing their letters. She
likes giving them another form of practice that is hands on. With her use of different curricula as
well as adding in her own activities, she gives students multiple ways to practice that suits the
needs of each student in her classroom. To her, the most effective strategies are strategies that use
a kinesthetic approach. Students are demonstrating those literacy skills with their hands, arms,
and legs. Students with special needs and speech IEPs are also benefiting from these strategies.
They get to visualize letter sounds that they are not remembering when only hearing them orally.
After I learned more about Ms. Misers instruction on phonological awareness, I wanted
to see if and how she was incorporating music into her instruction. Ms. Miser uses music all of
23
the time in her classroom. She explained that not only does she introduce concepts through
music, but she also uses it as a review tool. Ms. Miser said, “I have never come across a student
who didn’t benefit from learning a concept through music.” Students of all different abilities are
able to use music to learn and she noted that even her lowest achieving students have been able
to learn hard concepts when being taught with songs and rhymes. Ms. Miser is creative in using
music and makes up her own songs and rhymes for everything in her classroom, spanning all of
the subject areas as well as school rules and daily routines. Jack Hartman and Scratch Garden are
YouTube pages she frequents to teach these skills (Hartman, n.d., Garden, n.d.). She likes them
for their interactive components and feels that it is an easy way to incorporate music into the
curriculum. Nothing is holding Ms. Miser back from using music in her classroom. Music is
implemented in her lessons and throughout the day to get the day started, end the day, and used
as a calming tool. Ms. Miser explained to me that “our (her and her class’s) day never exists
without a song!
I also interviewed a third-grade teacher, Mrs. Stuart. Mrs. Stuart has been teaching for
many years in the district and has a lot of experience in using many techniques to teach her
students. In response to her current strategies that she uses to teach phonological awareness
skills, she explained that by third grade, the students should already have mastered the skills.
When she does return to these skills, she says she finds it best to put the skills in context by using
literature to help students brush up on these skills. She has created multiple binders of different
pieces of literature that she will use if it is necessary. When it comes to using music to help
amplify her phonological awareness instruction, it was explained that she does not use it for that
because it is review but does use music in other domains that are more third-grade friendly. She
shared a story with me about a student of hers who also attends the same church as her. One
24
Sunday at church there was a question asked about the continents, and her student quickly named
all seven of them. At school the next day, this student said, “that song you taught me really
helped me remember!” Although this is unrelated to phonological awareness skills, this shows
the power that music can have on students knowledge of any subject. Mrs. Stuart talked about
how music helps because students remember it. Mrs. Stuart said that “this act of remembering
can be used for many years to come and can be helpful in tasks that require them to recall their
knowledge on formal assessments like quizzes and tests, but also in informal ways like a
conversation they may have outside of school.
Before I conducted lessons in the second-grade classroom, I interviewed Mrs. Lester
about her beliefs on integrating music in her phonological awareness instruction. A strategy that
she uses frequently is read-alouds, specifically read-alouds with books that have been
purposefully chosen such as books with many rhymes, alliteration, and repetitive patterns. She
says these help students recognize phonological elements. She also uses the Heggerty curriculum
each morning which allows students to practice blending and segmenting words into individual
sounds. Mrs. Lester also uses games that engage students to practice different skills. These
games consist of rhyming games or word-building games. Lastly, Mrs. Lester uses a code chart
book that the CKLA curriculum uses. Students learn the different patterns in words and color
their code book based on the sound and the pattern’s frequency in words. Mrs. Lester likes this
because students are able to make the connection from the sound they hear to the spelling. Mrs.
Lester feels that the most effective strategy that she uses is Heggerty. When asked about using
music to teach phonological awareness skills, she explained that she often uses songs that she
finds on YouTube. She does believe that music is an effective tool and said, “students are
25
engaged, and recall is stronger for many students.” There is nothing holding Mrs. Lester back
from using music in her instructional strategies for phonological awareness.
After I had taught the series of lessons in the classroom, I re-interviewed Mrs. Lester to
gain her perspective on the lessons. She said she saw a difference in the students’ participation
and much more engagement when music was being used. She believes that the music helped
students recall and learn. When asked if her thoughts had changed on incorporating music into
phonological awareness lessons, she explained, “I have known this is an effective method for
teachers to use, especially with elementary students.” She also said that she would like to start
using it more frequently now that she has seen it used and that there is still nothing holding her
back.
Throughout the school that I completed my research, music has been used in many ways
to help students learn. In Ms. Miser’s kindergarten classroom and Mrs. Lesters second grade
classroom, students are using music to build upon other curricula such as Heggerty, CKLA, and
Visual Phonics. They are also using music to supplement with other additional activities that are
used in their classrooms frequently. In Mrs. Stuarts third grade classroom, although she does not
use music for phonological awareness skills, she implements music to teach other third grade
content. In each of the three classrooms, the teachers report seeing a positive impact on their
students’ learning when using music. Students are engaged, focused, using the song outside of
the school setting, and truly love when they get to learn in that way. YouTube, specifically Jack
Hartman and Scratch Garden, was noted multiple times as the place to find catchy songs to help
students learn. With many years of experience from each of these teachers, they understand the
importance of students developing phonological awareness skills that will help them become
better readers and writers, especially in Mrs. Lester and Ms. Miser’s classes where they are
26
building a foundation. There are many ways that these teachers are teaching these skills like
rhyming, alliteration, blends, digraphs, short and long vowels, decoding, encoding, etc., but
music is a staple in each of their classrooms to supplement the instruction on these necessary
skills. In addition to the methods being used by these teachers, the music teacher, Mrs. Emigh, is
there to offer support in whatever way that they may need it. Although she is unable to do much
with the content learning standards in her class time, she recognizes the importance of making
connections when she can. She also sees every day how engaged her students are in music class
which remains consistent with what the grade level teachers have seen in their room when they
incorporate music.
Lesson Observations
Throughout the implementation of the lessons, I primarily focused on the students’
engagement and participation. I also analyzed the worksheets that they completed directly
following the lesson and tracked any changes in performance. I will now discuss each of these
points in correspondence to the lessons.
The first lessons I will discuss will be the lessons on the blends SL and CL. SL was
taught without music. First, I completed Heggerty which consists of many key phonological
awareness skills. The three main skills that were focused on in these Heggerty lessons were
blending phonemes, segmenting words into phonemes, and encoding. I also focused on the
students engagement/disengagement. I noted engagement when students were keeping eyes
forward, completing the hand motions in Heggerty, speaking the parts of Heggerty, participating
in discussion by raising hand, answering prompts, etc. I noticed disengagement when students
were looking around the room, not staying in their seats, not doing the hand motions for
Heggerty, not speaking aloud Heggerty prompts, and not willing to participate in discussion.
27
When students were blending phonemes, I provided them with the phonemes like in the example
word blast. I said the phoneme sounds rather than the letters. Students then repeated the sounds
and blended the word to say blast. The next skill, segmenting, involved students hearing a word
such as blast and then students were to ‘chop it up’ into the sounds. They would say, “b-l-a-s-t,
blast.” The final skill was encoding. I said a word, students broke it up into the sounds they
heard, then they spelled the word. This skill helps students transfer the knowledge of phoneme
sounds to how they would write the word. After Heggerty, I briefly taught the concepts of a
consonant blend in a class wide discussion. I introduced them to the SL blend and gave them
multiple words as examples, then I asked them for examples. Some students were eager to share
and came up with a variety of words. Other students were less engaged in this and did not raise
their hands to participate but were looking around the room. Around 25% of the students were
actively participating in this discussion based off of hands raised. Students then started on the
worksheet. The first page featured pictures of words with and without the SL blend. I read these
aloud and instructed students to circle pictures of words that they heard the SL blend sound and
to cross off the ones that did not. As I said the words, a handful of students would say it slower
using the skill of breaking apart phonemes like in Heggerty. However, most were very quickly
circling or crossing off.
I taught the CL blend the following day. After Heggerty was completed, the CL blend was
taught in a whole group setting. Students were asked what C sounds like and then L. They then
blended them together and correctly said the CL sound. A song on the CL blend was then shown.
Students were invited to sing along and interact with the video shown. Throughout the song,
students slowly started singing, dancing, and clapping with the song as they became more
comfortable. Before we moved to the worksheet, we reviewed the CL blend as a group. I asked
28
students to raise their hands and give examples of words with this blend, just like the day before.
Immediately, hands were in the air. Nearly the entire class was raising their hands ready to
provide a word for the CL blend. We then moved into completing the worksheet for the CL
blend. Like SL, I read the first page, and they circled words with the SL blend. Unlike the day
before, students were humming the words quietly and a few were even singing the sound aloud
to help them. Others were tapping out the words like they are used to doing. Students were
utilizing this new song about the CL blend to help them determine if the CL blend was in the
word I had said.
When looking at the achievement level on the SL and CL lesson segments, there was
improvement in many students in the CL lesson that utilized music. Fifteen students were present
for both the SL and the CL lesson, and their data was included in this comparison. Of these
students, five students improved on the recognition of sounds and circled more blends correctly
during the CL lesson. Eight students circled all pictures correctly on both the SL and the CL
lesson. Two students had a slight decline in performance on day two and circled some of the non-
blend CL words in the picture. Pictures that depicted curl, cold, and call were the most missed by
these two students. On the back of the worksheet students had a list of words and circled the
words with the blends in them. During the SL worksheet, thirteen of the fifteen perfectly
recognized the blends in the words. The other two students had missed circling two of the SL
blend words. During the CL worksheet, all fifteen students circled all of the words correctly.
The following week, I taught the second segment of lessons on the blends BR and CR. I
started with BR. I followed the same format with Heggerty, discussion, and then a worksheet for
the BR blend. At this point, students were very familiar with the lesson and many asked, “are we
going to hear another song?” or “is there another video to watch?” When I answered them and
29
said that there was not today, many were disappointed. Engagement was lower in Heggerty than
previous days. The same students who are always active participants in Heggerty were still
participating, but the students who do not always participate were not participating and required
many reminders. After Heggerty, we talked about the BR blend, and I again asked for some
examples. Some students shared and then we moved on to completing the worksheet. On this
day, I saw less hands than the day we had learned with music. All students present completed the
worksheet and if they were using a skill to hear the blend, they would tap it out. I noted that
students seemed very disengaged with the worksheet. Students’ focus was wandering to look out
the window, tapping their pencil, talking, and overall, not engaged with the lesson as a whole.
The following day, I taught the CR blend, this time incorporating music in between
Heggerty and the worksheet. When the screen came on with a video, many were very excited
about the song. They showed their excitement by cheering and I even had a few students thank
me for showing them a video. It took less time for students to start interacting with the video.
They were clapping and singing along in no time. Just like in the lessons before, I asked for
examples with the blend in it. After the music, almost the entire class was raising their hands
ready to share a word with me. Students were sitting up and attentive to the words their peers
were providing and were eager to answer. Throughout the worksheet, I saw the same results.
More students had stopped tapping it out and were instead singing the song from the video to
help them determine if the word had the CR blend or not. I observed a small group of students,
around six or seven, using both the song and tap out the word. There was even an increase in
those using the song from the CL lesson to this lesson on CR. During the CR worksheet,
approximately 75% of the students in the class were connecting the worksheet to the song they
had heard whether it be through humming, mouthing the words to the lyrics, or very quietly
30
singing it to themselves. I noted this by writing down names of students who I saw and heard
using the song.
During the BR and CR lesson segment, there was apparent growth in knowledge of
blends. Fifteen students completed both lessons in this segment. Eleven students had perfect
scores on the blend recognition picture side of the worksheet for both the BR and CR blend. This
is an improvement from eight during the SL and CL lesson segment. Three students made
improvements from the BR lesson to the CR lesson. Only one student had a decline from the BR
lesson to the CR lesson. On the backside of the worksheet, all fifteen students had perfect
performance in recognizing the blends in a list of words.
31
Chapter Five
Discussion
Throughout this chapter, I will discuss the key takeaways from the research I studied, my
interviews, and the lessons I taught on blends with and without the integration of music. As I
discuss the results, I will align them with my research question: Does using music in
phonological awareness instruction increase student engagement and achievement?
Teacher Interviews
I conducted interviews with grade level kindergarten, second, and third grade teachers to
gauge an understanding of their phonological awareness instruction and their beliefs of using in
their classroom to teach phonological awareness. In each grade level, I saw many common
themes across the teachers’ beliefs on the use of music within their classroom that I will expand
on.
Each teacher in the grade level classroom explained that when they use music, they see
an increased level of engagement across their class. Mrs. Emigh also stated that most kids are
engaged in music lessons during music class. Students are interacting with the material in a way
that is beneficial to their recall of the knowledge when using music as a support. In Mrs. Stuarts
class, she explained that music was beneficial in her students’ lessons on continents and in both
Mrs. Lester and Mrs. Miser’s classes music was beneficial to teach different aspects of language
like rhyming, alliteration, syllables, etc. This is consistent with the study completed by Lee
(2009) who taught students vocabulary in a new language using music. Lee found that students
retained the new material much better as well as interacted with it better when put in music form.
In the study completed using the Kodaly music program (Hurwitz et. al, 1975), the researchers
32
noted the same outcome of more energy, engagement, and motivation. Not every lesson will
initially strike a student as being interesting or entertaining, but by providing an additional
support with the integration of music into the lesson, more students will be engaged, which will
help them take in the information being presented.
Integrating music can be as simple or as complex as a teacher would like it to be. Many
teachers, including Ms. Miser and Mrs. Lester, use pre-made music tracks available on YouTube.
These are easily accessible and include songs that cover many different skills and content areas.
These also provide a visual along with the music. If a teacher was interested in creating a song
based on the content in their curriculum, they could always use the school music teacher as a
resource. Mrs. Emigh, the music teacher at the school where I completed my research, explained
that there is not enough time to focus on both the music standards and the content standards in
the short amount of time she spends with students, but that she is able to help teachers locate
resources or record tracks if needed. With this resource available to teachers, they could find
more opportunities to integrate music in their classroom. In the study by Hurwitz (1975),
teachers were using the Kodaly music program which showed a positive correlation with
phonological awareness abilities. Kodaly does not have direct ties to phonological awareness, but
researchers found that it did have an effect on literacy performance (Hurwitz, 1975). This shows
that there may be programs that already have elements that combine the two domains. If these
are available for schools to adopt, the integration could happen more naturally yet still have the
same effect on students in their knowledge of other content areas.
Throughout my conduction of interviews, I saw that music was a common thread in each
of the classrooms that I visited. It was aiding in their instruction of the curricula that the school
had already adopted. I went into each interview unsure of what to expect from the different
33
teachers as they had different levels of experience in teaching and were taught at different ages.
Because they all do incorporate music in some way, there is evidence to show the many
capabilities that music has across the lower elementary grades. My research was conducted in a
K-3 setting but would be interesting to see if the use of music being beneficial to instruction is
also occurring in the upper elementary grades. As students progress in school, the academic
content standards become more rigorous, similar to the music content standards. By integrating
them together, students have the potential to increase their achievement in both areas.
Interviewing teachers was a beneficial and necessary piece of the research that I
conducted as it gave me insight to the current use of music across elementary school. Students
spend very limited time in music class and because of this not much integration can be
completed during that small amount of time. However, teachers in grade level classrooms are
integrating music in cohorts with the school adopted curricula using pre-made music they find on
the internet. They primarily see a difference in the engagement of their students which remains
consistent with the currently published research. A teacher needs to know their students to know
how they best learn, but Ms. Miser stated that she has never seen a student not benefit from
music integration.
Consonant Blend Lessons
In the series of four lessons taught on consonant blends, Mrs. Lester and I observed the
stark difference between when the lessons incorporated music and when they did not. Not only
was engagement higher class-wide, but students’ performance on the short worksheet was also
different in the lessons with and without music. Using the songs gave students more exposure to
words with the specific blend and without the music, students were not engaged and not provided
with words that they could share and discuss.
34
I used songs in the CR blend and the CL blend lessons taught on the second day of that
learning segment. In the previous days, engagement was low and there was not much
participation, but on these days, the engagement was much higher. Students were excited to have
both the visual of the video and the music. On the second day with music, students were even
asking for music and had much more energy. They sang along, danced, and then applied it to
their worksheet. When students knew that music would be a part of that day’s lesson, they
showed even more interest in the topic through more participation in conversation and Heggerty.
Herwitz (1975), Wiggins (2007), and Blasco-Magraner (2021) all noticed increased engagement
and motivation in their research as well. With literacy performance being at a 30.6% in the
previous school year for the state of Ohio (Ohio State Report Card, 2023), something that
increases student motivation and achievement could be beneficial to literacy performance. This
would hopefully raise the literacy performance score. In multiple observational and quantitative
studies, including my own, this integration of music was proven beneficial.
Phonological awareness is important to the success of the reader (National Reading
Panel, 2002)). In these lessons, students learned the phonological awareness skill of a consonant
blend. Consonant blends are when two to three consonants are right next to each other in a word,
and each give their own sound (Invernizzi et. al, 2023). On the back side of the worksheet,
students had a list of words that they were reading and then circled the words with the consonant
blend present. Throughout the worksheets, students excelled at recognizing the blends. By the
second segment of lessons, all students who participated missed zero words on the back of the
paper. Because students knew the sound of the blend, they were able to use their skills to read the
word. When students come across words in their reading, they will be able to read words with
consonant blends in them. In the research completed by Kozminsky and Kozminsky (1995), they
35
saw that students with phonological awareness instruction were better readers and comprehended
texts better. This relationship makes the solidification of skills valuable for students as they will
continue to read for comprehension throughout school and life. Although students could have
learned the blends through lessons without the use of music, the music makes the learning
memorable, and material stays with the students for a longer period of time.
Limitations
There are a number of limitations to the research that I have conducted. The first is that I
had a small sample size of only 24 students. Among these 24 students, there were many absences
throughout the four days that I taught the lessons. This caused me to only have data on 15
students for each segment of blends lessons who were there for both lessons. With more students
and a larger sampling group, the data has the potential to show more about the achievement
across the lessons. Another addition could be to do lessons with music that is pre-made like I did
as well as lessons with songs that are created by the teacher in conjunction with the music
teacher. This could add more engaging elements like instruments and movement and be even
more purposeful. These two styles of integrating music could be compared with no music to
further show the differences. I only completed instruction for two days using music and two days
without. Due to time and scheduling constraints, the four lessons were not taught in four
consecutive days but had the weekend in between which is the reason for being taught in two
segments. Lastly, the group of second grade students, although I had relationships with them,
were not part of my personal class. I did not regularly teach them lessons in my teacher
preparation program at this time, so there may have been hesitation on both of our parts in the
instruction.
36
Future Research
Through the completion of my research on the effectiveness of integrating music into
phonological awareness instruction, I was met with the challenge of having little research to
draw from. The topic of music integration into the general education classroom as a whole has
not been researched to the extent that it could be. Finding specific studies on phonological
awareness instruction with music was even more of a challenge. Phonological awareness is a
predecessor of successful reading which makes it that much more important. I recommend more
research on this material to create an educational system that recognizes the benefits of music
integration and the role it plays on literacy success. It is being used and this can be seen through
the multitudes of YouTube videos, but with even more purposeful use, the growth of students’
literacy could be improved. There is work that needs to be done to improve the current state of
literacy achievement and as more support is researched, we can find more ways to help students.
As educators, our main goal is to teach our students and continue to foster their learning growth.
More research would provide the resources that educators need in order to integrate music
successfully into their instruction.
37
References
Blasco-Magraner, J.B., Bernabe-Valero, G.V., Marin-Liebana, P.M., Moret-Tatay, C.M. (2021).
Effects of the Educational use of music on 3 to 12-year-old children’s emotional
development: A systematic review. International Journal of Environmental Research and
Public Health.
Bolduc, J.B. (2009). Effects of a music programme of kindergartners phonological awareness
skills. International Journal of Music Education, Vol. 27.
Chard, D.C. & Dickinson, S.D. (1999). Phonological awareness: Instructional and assessment
guidelines. Reading Rockets. https://www.readingrockets.org/topics/phonological-and-
phonemic-awareness/articles/phonological-awareness-instructional-and#skip-to-main
Eccles, R.E., Linde, J.L., Roux, M.R., Swanepoel, D.S., MacCutcheon, D.M., Ljung, R.L.
(2021). The effect of music education approaches on phonological awareness and early
literacy: A systematic review. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, Vol. 44.
Gough, P.G., Tunmer, W.T. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and
Special Education, Vol. 7.
Hartman. (n.d.) Jack Hartman Kids Music Channel [YouTube Channel]. Retrieved April 12,
2023, from https://www.youtube.com/@JackHartmann
Heggerty, M. (2020). Phonemic awareness. Literacy Resources, Inc.
Hurwitz, I.H., Wolff, P.W. (1975). Nonmusical effects of the kodaly music curriculum in primary
grade children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, Vol. 8.
38
Invernizzi, M.I., Bear, D.B., Templeton, S.T., Johston, F.J. (2020). Words their way: Word study
for phonics, vocabulary, and spelling instruction (7
th
ed.). Pearson.
Kozminsky, L.K. & Kozminsky, E.K. (1995). The effects of early phonological awareness
training on reading success. Learning and Instruction, Vol. 5.
Lee, L.L. (2009). An empirical study on teaching urban young children music and english by
contrastive elements of music and songs. US-China Education Review, Vol. 6.
National Association for the Education of Young Children (2018). NAEYC Early Learning
Program Standards. https://www.naeyc.org/sites/default/files/globally-
shared/downloads/PDFs/accreditation/early-learning/overview_of_the_standards.pdf
National Reading Panel (U.S.). (2002). Teaching children to read : an evidence-based
assessment of reading scientific research literature on reading and its implications for
reading instruction.
Ohio Department of Education (2017). Ohio’s learning
standards. https://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Learning-in-Ohio/OLS-Graphic-
Sections/Learning-Standards
Ohio Department of Education (2023). Ohio School Report Cards.
https://reportcard.education.ohio.gov/
Ohio Department of Education (2019). Ohio’s Plan to Raise Literacy Achievement.
Ohio Department of Education (2022). Fine Arts Standards.
https://education.ohio.gov/Topics/Learning-in-Ohio/Fine-Arts/Fine-Arts-Standards
39
Phonics Garden. (2022, Oct. 1). CR Blend| Blue Grass Phonics| Letter Blend Sounds| Phonics
Garden [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/F5sfOQKe0Bo?si=C1cOSnZQykTahM4o
Rock ‘N Learn. (2022, Oct. 1). CL Blend Sound | CL Blend Song and Practice | ABC Phonics
Song with Sounds for Children [Video]. YouTube. https://youtu.be/yrDffjZaMCs?si=Q-
Meg_ltGY_2XF4o
Scarborough, H.S. (2002). Toward a common terminology for talking about speech and reading:
A glossary of the “phon” words and some related terms. Journal of Literacy Research,
Vol. 34.
Scratch Garden. (n.d.). Scratch Garden [YouTube Channel]. Retrieved April 12, 2023, from
https://www.youtube.com/@ScratchGarden
Whitehurst, G.W., Lonigan, C.L. (2001). Emergent literacy: Development from prereaders to
readers. Neuman, S.N. (ed.), Dickinson, D.D. (ed.). Handbook of Early Literacy
Research (pp. 11-29). New York, New York. Guilford Publications, Inc. .
Wiggins, D.G. (2007). Pre-K music and the emergent reader: Promoting literacy in a music-
enhanced environment. Early Childhood Journal, Vol. 35.
40
Appendix A
General Education Teacher Interview Questions
1. What are the instructional strategies that you use to teach students emergent literacy
and phonological awareness skills?
2. Which of these strategies have you found to be the most effective in your classroom?
3. Have you ever used music to teach these skills?
4. What are your thoughts on incorporating music into your instruction to emulsify your
instruction on emergent literacy and phonological awareness skills?
5. Is there anything holding you back from using music in your instruction?
41
Appendix B
Music Teacher Interview Questions
1. What is the engagement like when students are in music class?
2. Do you think that music should be used in general education classroom to help amplify
the teachers instruction on certain topics such as phonological awareness and emergent
literacy?
3. In what ways can you support a classroom teacher if they want to or do use music in their
instruction?
4. Do you ever incorporate their skills from their general education classroom into your
instruction with the students? Why or why not?
42
Appendix C
Post-Lesson Interview Questions
1. Did you see a difference in the students’ participation, engagement, etc. when I used
music in the lesson compared to when I didn’t?
2. Do you think that using music helped instruction?
3. Have your thoughts changed on your view of incorporating music into a lesson on
emergent literacy or phonological awareness skills?
4. Would you be interested in trying to use music in your classroom more frequently now
that you have seen it used?
5. Is there anything holding you back?
43
Appendix D
Lesson Worksheet
44
Appendix E
Lesson Videos
Rock ‘N Learn, R.N. (2022, Oct. 1). CL Blend Sound | CL Blend Song and Practice |
ABC Phonics Song with Sounds for Children [Video]. Youtube.
https://youtu.be/yrDffjZaMCs?si=Q-Meg_ltGY_2XF4o
Phonics Garden, P.G. (2022, Oct. 1). CR Blend| Blue Grass Phonics| Letter Blend Sounds|
Phonics Garden [Video]. Youtube. https://youtu.be/F5sfOQKe0Bo?si=C1cOSnZQykTahM4o
45
Appendix F
IRB Paperwork