of Social Work & Social Welfare
Strengthening Health Care Systems:
Better Health Across America
American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare
grandchallengesforsocialwork.org
Strengthening
Health Care Systems:
Better Health Across America
Teri Browne
University of South Carolina
Sarah Gehlert
University of South Carolina
Christina M. Andrews
University of South Carolina
Bradley J. Zebrack
University of Michigan
Virginia N. Walther
Mount Sinai Hospital
Gail Steketee
Boston University
Peter Maramaldi
Simmons College and Harvard University
Barbara L. Jones
University of Texas at Austin
Robyn L. Golden
Rush University Medical Center
Bonnie Ewald
Rush University Medical Center
Susan R. Bernstein
Mount Sinai Hospital
Audrey L. Begun
The Ohio State University
Heidi L. Allen
Columbia University
Susan Guth
Society for Social Work
Leadership in Health Care
Abigail Ross
Fordham University
Megan Moore
University of Washington
Joseph R. Merighi
University of Minnesota
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper No. 22
November 2017
Grand Challenge: Close the Health Gap
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Grand Challenges for Social Work Initiative
The Grand Challenges for Social Work are designed to focus a world of thought and action on the most compelling
and critical social issues of our day. Each grand challenge is a broad but discrete concept where social work
expertise and leadership can be brought to bear on bold new ideas, scientific exploration and surprising innovations.
We invite you to review the following challenges with the goal of providing greater clarity, utility and meaning to
this roadmap for lifting up the lives of individuals, families and communities struggling with the most fundamental
requirements for social justice and human existence.
The Grand Challenges for Social Work include the following:
Ensure healthy development of all youth
Close the health gap
Stop family violence
Eradicate social isolation
End homelessness
Promote smart decarceration
Reduce extreme economic inequality
Build financial capability for all
Harness technology for social good
Create social responses to a changing environment
Achieve equal opportunity and justice
Advance long and productive lives
Executive Committee
Co-Chairs
Marilyn Flynn
University of Southern California
Michael Sherraden
Washington University in St. Louis
Edwina Uehara
University of Washington
Richard P. Barth
University of Maryland
John S. Brekke
University of Southern California
Darla Spence Coffey
Council on Social Work Education
Rowena Fong
University of Texas at Austin
Sarah Gehlert
University of South Carolina
J. David Hawkins
University of Washington
Charles E. Lewis Jr.
Congressional Research Institute for Social
Work & Policy
James E. Lubben
Boston College
Ronald W. Manderscheid
National Association of County Behavioral
Health & Developmental Disability Directors
Angelo McClain
National Association of Social Workers
Yolanda C. Padilla
University of Texas at Austin
Karina L. Walters
University of Washington
Patricia White
Hunter College
James Herbert Williams
Arizona State University
Gail Steketee (ex officio)
American Academy of Social Work & Social
Welfare and Boston University
Sarah Christa Butts (staff)
University of Maryland
Michele Clark (staff)
University of Southern California
Lissa Johnson (staff)
Washington University in St. Louis
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Strengthening Health Care Systems:
Better Health Across America
Teri Browne, Sarah Gehlert, Christina M. Andrews, Bradley J. Zebrack,
Virginia N. Walther, Gail Steketee, Peter Maramaldi, Barbara L. Jones, Robyn L.
Golden, Bonnie Ewald, Susan R. Bernstein, Audrey L. Begun,
Heidi L. Allen,
Susan Guth, Abigail Ross, Megan Moore, and Joseph R. Merighi
In this Grand Challenges for Social Work paper, we explore how social work leadership can
strengthen health care systems in the United States over the coming decade toward the goal of
improving health across the country. This paper complements existing papers related to the
Close the Health Gap Grand Challenge: Health Equity: Eradicating Health Inequalities for
Future Generations and Reducing and Preventing Alcohol Misuse and Its Consequences: A
Grand Challenge for Social Work. Eradicating health inequities in the United States requires
diverse strategies that target the multiple settings in which disparities are created and
perpetuated: in neighborhoods, communities and institutions, and the health care system itself.
The addition of this proposal to the others addressing this Grand Challenge will significantly
hasten our ability to close the nation’s health gap within the next decade.
Key words: American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare; Bridge Model; care
transition; equity; Grand Challenge to Close the Health Gap; Grand Challenges for Social
Work; health care; health equity; health social work; Ida M. Cannon; leadership; medical
model; Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010; public relations; Richard C.
Cabot; social determinants of health; social entrepreneurship; training
HEALTH AND HEALTH CARE IN THE UNITED STATES
Health-care payer and provider systems in the United States have historically been grounded in
what has been termed a “medical model” of health care delivery. That model emphasizes
treatment of acute illness (Adler, Glymour, & Fielding, 2016) but focuses little attention on the
social and environmental context for health and wellness. A growing body of research suggests
that the medical model has failed to produce desired improvements in population health.
In the United States, the National Center for Health Statistics reports that life expectancy at
birth has declined for the first time since 1993 (Xu, Murphy, Kochanek, & Arias, 2016). The
10 leading causes of death remained the same in 2014 and 2015, and age-adjusted death rates
increased for eight of those 10 leading causes.
1
The United States likewise performs poorly if
1
In 2014 and 2015, the 10 leading causes of death in the United States were heart disease, cancer, chronic lower-
respiratory diseases, unintended injuries, stroke, Alzheimer’s disease, diabetes, influenza and pneumonia, kidney
disease, and suicide (Xu et al., 2016).
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 2
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
compared with other industrialized nations. In 2007, the United States ranked dead last among
17 peer countries for life expectancy among men and 16th out of 17 for it among women
(National Research Council & Institute of Medicine, 2013). Importantly, the report’s authors
note the following:
Large within-country health disparities in the United States may contribute in important
ways to the nation’s overall health disadvantage relative to other high-income countries.
Although studies reviewed in this report suggest that the health disadvantage relative to
peer countries persists even when the U.S. data are limited to non-Hispanic whites or
upper-income populations, the U.S. health disadvantage is clearly far greater among the
large proportion of Americans who live amid unfavorable health conditions. (p. 41;
emphasis added)
Health disadvantage is in large measure a product of social determinants. These determinants are
the “conditions in the places where people live, learn, work, and play” (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention 2017, para. 1). They are estimated to contribute greatly to population
health—more so than health behaviors and medical care (Braveman & Gottlieb, 2014; Centers
for Disease Control and Prevention, 2017). Fortunately, enactment of the Patient Protection and
Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010 has drawn attention to the important role of social
determinants in population health outcomes.
Social determinants are mutable, and numerous efforts have attempted to shape them. Creating
social and physical environments that promote good health for all is one of the four overarching
goals identified by Healthy People 2020 (Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion,
n.d.). For example, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (2016; CDC) seek to address
social determinants of health through such efforts as Partnerships to Improve Community Health,
the Built Environment and Health Initiative, and the Racial and Ethnic Approaches to
Community Health (REACH) program. Likewise, the Innovation Center at the Centers for
Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) launched the Accountable Health Communities Model
to test interventions that address psychosocial barriers to outcomes (Alley, Asomugha, Conway,
& Sanghavi, 2016). Ongoing evaluation research and policy advocacy are essential to ensure that
such programs persist in the changing political environment.
Initiatives to address social determinants of health must be defined broadly enough to
incorporate the full range of social, economic, and environmental forces shaping health. Some
efforts have fallen short by focusing on individual behavior and demographics rather than on
the physical and social contexts in which people live. Disregarding those contexts will likely
produce errant interventions that negatively affect treatment choices and the outcomes of care.
For example, an assessment of the likely health outcome for a 65-year-old African American
woman diagnosed with breast cancer would typically take into account only her demographic
variables: income, race, and age. But her health care (e.g., the type and frequency of
chemotherapy and radiation) will be affected by the fact that she is raising two great-
grandchildren, aged 3 and 7, who have a parent in addiction treatment. Those obligations
require involvement with child care, a school, and the corrections office, which monitors visits
between the children and their parent. If the patient attends a church with a health ministry, its
services may reduce the need for community supports such as meal delivery and home health
care. If she lacks child care, visits to the radiation, medical, and surgical oncologists will be
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 3
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
affected. Mental health services may be needed to address her worry about the fate of the
children should she not survive her breast cancer.
Characterizing this woman only by race, age, and income would omit critical information about
her social circumstances, potentially altering her treatment and worsening her outcomes. This
example demonstrates how the traditional medical model can influence treatment decisions
developed without considering the real world context, which determines whether patients can
benefit from the prescribed treatment.
HEALTH SOCIAL WORK
Health Social Work and the Roles of Social Workers
From its beginning, health social work has served as a bridge to connect physicians with patients
and their families. Dr. Richard Cabot hired the first medical social worker in the United States.
This woman, Garnet Pelton, was hired at Massachusetts General Hospital in 1905 and paid out of
pocket by Dr. Cabot. Dr. Cabot (1915) wrote that that social workers could translate physicians’
explanations of illness and treatment instructions in terms that individuals and families could
understand (Cabot, 1915). He also held that social workers were able to explain to physicians the
factors in patients’ social lives that might affect their health. Cabot (1912) asserted that
physicians and social workers had much to learn from one another (Cabot, 1912). Social
workers, he believed, should learn to be more systematic and scientific (Cabot, 1911). He
asserted that physicians should learn how to understand the nonsomatic aspects of health.
Ida Cannon, who trained at the Simmons School of Social Work and became the first director of
social work at Massachusetts General, worked with Cabot. Both recognized an important role
played by social workers: problem solvers who could understand health and medicine as well as
community resources and deficits. This recognition is germane in the United States today
because social workers are positioned to tailor recommendations, treatments, and referrals in
ways that match patients’ daily routines and lived reality. Cannon emphasized social work’s
agility in adapting to accommodate developments:
Basically, social work, wherever and whenever practiced at its best, is a constantly
changing activity, gradually building up guiding principles from accumulated knowledge
yet changing in techniques. Attitudes change, too, in response to shifting social
philosophies (Cannon, 1952, p. 9).
Social work demonstrated the ability to adapt to sociopolitical shifts when Medicare and
Medicaid legislation expanded hospital access for previously uninsured populations with
complex medical and social issues. It did so again in the mid-1980s, when federally imposed
cost-containment measures fundamentally changed health care delivery. This flexibility
positions health social workers well to deal with health reform’s changes in models of health
care delivery.
Another enduring strength of the profession is its broad understanding that individuals are
embedded in social networks, neighborhoods, and communities. Implicit in this understanding is
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 4
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
the recognition that those contexts influence knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors, all of
which can influence health choices and participation in health care. Securing positive long-term
health outcomes requires the expertise of professionals who are familiar with the intricacies and
intersections of the complex social systems in which individuals are situated. Social workers are
trained to view health as part of the greater social context in which our patients live, work, and
play (Newman, Baum, Javanparast, O’Rourke, & Carlon, 2015). They are equipped with the
insights necessary to achieve population health goals.
In addition, social workers are uniquely trained to work across the continuum of health care
settings to successfully identify, facilitate, coordinate, and monitor services that an individual
requires to maintain optimal health. They also are trained to seek solutions and resources from
within the individual’s social context. The profession’s unique understanding of the
interdependent relationships among health, education, employment, criminal justice, education,
and other systems enables it to serve as the nexus from which resources are drawn to protect,
maintain, and restore health. Social workers routinely negotiate such systems to ensure that the
many needs of clients are addressed in ways intended to advance optimal health. This work is
done at the micro (individual), mezzo (health care system), and macro (socio-structural) levels.
For example, social workers coordinate supports across multiple systems to address the needs of
patients upon discharge, communicate with patients and caregivers to ensure that discharge
instructions are understood, and confirm that necessary resources are in place for optimal care.
Social workers serving in community settings know how to ensure access to services and
resources that enable individuals to remain within their home and community. Social workers
play an essential role in identifying nonmedical and social barriers that may impede an
individual’s ability to access health care services. They provide assistance in resolving these
barriers. Social workers also use their skills to prevent adverse health conditions by intervening
in community settings (e.g., schools, criminal justice) and by advocating for racial and
environmental justice.
Social Work and Health Reform
The ACA’s 2010 enactment created unprecedented opportunities to encourage the health care
system to be more responsive to the influences of social determinants on health. It created new
roles and opportunities for social work, including shifts toward preventive approaches to solving
social problems and expansions outside of traditional health-care settings. In addition, the act
established a wide range of demonstration programs and initiatives designed to improve health care
financing and population health by attending to social context. Examples include new payment
models tied to quality metrics and alternative payment strategies. Accountable Care Organizations
(ACOs), bundled payments, managed long-term services and supports, Medicaid Health Homes,
and Accountable Health Communities all represent the fruits of those new models. The models
require interdisciplinary collaboration and better care coordination. They provide important
opportunities for social workers to join delivery-system reform efforts in areas such as patient
navigation, care management, transitional care, and end-of-life care, as well as in efforts to
integrate behavioral and physical health services (National Association of Social Workers, 2016).
As we enter the next chapter in health social work’s history, the ACA faces the prospect of
repeal, major revision, or replacement. During the first half of 2017, congressional efforts
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 5
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
proposed several significant changes to the act, including removal of the requirements that
individuals have health insurance coverage and that insurance policies provide essential health
benefits. A proposed cap on federal Medicaid funding to states would convert the program’s
funding stream to a block grant system. Assurances of insurability for people with pre-existing
conditions are also in jeopardy. Such changes would likely limit health care access and quality
for all Americans (Congressional Budget Office, 2017a, 2017b, 2017c). Fortunately, those
legislative efforts did not propose elimination of many initiatives that the ACA established to
improve care coordination and value: ACOs, bundled payments, and financial incentives and
penalties to improve care transitions. Now, as in 1965 when Medicare was enacted, social
workers are needed at the front lines of health care policy to protect the health care system, to
develop it in ways that make the system more responsive to social determinants of health, and to
advocate for changes that will afford everyone access to the system.
MODELS OF HEALTH SOCIAL WORK
Efforts in five key domains can inform models of health social work practice that will leverage
health care systems to address social and community factors shaping health outcomes: (1)
increasing screening and prevention, (2) addressing economic and environmental stressors in
health care, (3) improving care management and coordination, (4) promoting interventions
tailored for vulnerable populations, and (5) facilitating successful care transitions.
Increasing Screening and Prevention
Helping individuals engage in health screenings and preventative services is one of the many
important roles played by health social workers. Such screenings can include assessment of
loneliness and social isolation, which are increasingly linked to negative health outcomes (Holt-
Lunstad & Smith, 2016; Valtorta, Kanaan, Gilbody, Ronzi, & Hanratty, 2016), as well as efforts
to screen for material hardship and other negative social determinants. Moreover, social workers
deliver interventions that may prevent the physical consequences of such stressors.
In oncology settings, social workers help communities navigate the barriers to cancer screenings
and prevention (Burg et al., 2010). Social workers also play a critical role in addressing
psychosocial barriers to genetic cancer testing (Werner-Lin, McCoyd, Doyle, & Gehlert, 2016;
Young et al., 2017). Nephrology social workers help dialysis patients to be tested and listed for
kidney transplants (Browne, 2011). Social work scholars Jason Bird, Dexter Voisin, and Daryl
Wheeler have provided a large body of research on the connections linking community and
social factors with behaviors related to HIV prevention. That can also inform social work
practice (Bird & Voisin, 2011; Holmes et al., 2008; Marrazzo et al., 2014; Voisin, Bird, Shiu, &
Krieger, 2013; Wheeler, 2011).
Addressing Economic and Environmental Stressors in Health Care
Social work makes critical contributions to ameliorate the economic and environmental stressors
in health care systems, including stressors related to health disparities. Within health systems,
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 6
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
social workers help individuals recognize and address the effects of stress experienced during
life transitions (e.g., divorce and job loss). These experiences may cause health to decline.
Medicaid Health Homes and ACOs, funded by the Medicare Shared Savings Program, represent
important initiatives in which social workers can lead interventions to improve patient access to
community resources. Through that leadership, social workers can reduce social isolation and
discrimination, which adversely affect health outcomes (Allen, 2012). Social workers can
advance efforts to address these stressors through ACOs (Gehlert, Collins, Golden, & Horn,
2015).
2
Research by Gehlert and colleagues on epigenomic neighborhood factors and health
disparities offers further insights into social work’s possible roles in addressing social
determinants that can lead to health disparities (Gehlert & Coleman, 2010; Gehlert et al., 2008).
To, wit, social work can help contextualize individuals and communities in order to facilitate
identification of specific factors that influence health.
Improving Care Management and Coordination
The social work profession leads efforts to better coordinate health care. Kathleen Ell, at the
University of Southern California’s Suzanne Dworak-Peck School of Social Work, has
demonstrated how care coordination and patient navigation interactions can improve community-
based cancer services, particularly for racial and ethnic subpopulations (see, e.g., Ell et al., 2010,
2011, 2012). The Chicago Cancer Navigation Project is another example of successful social
work leadership in patient navigation. The project helps to manage and coordinate care for
vulnerable populations (Markossian, Darnell, & Calhoun, 2012; Tejeda et al., 2013). At Mount
Sinai Hospital in New York City, social workers have played a key role in establishing and
managing a Medicaid Health Home. Through the innovative Health Home model of care
coordination, health care providers can receive an enhanced Medicaid match rate by providing
care-coordination and wrap-around services for enrollees with specific chronic conditions.
Promoting Interventions Tailored for Vulnerable Populations
Vulnerable populations are more likely to suffer chronic health problems (Centers for Disease
Control and Prevention, 2013). Social workers can lead research and interventions to promote
health parity. The REACH-Detroit program offers an example of an integrated model of health
care led by social work to reduce health disparities. One of 24 such programs initially funded
by the CDC, REACH-Detroit began in 2000 and is overseen by Michael Spencer at the
University of Michigan School of Social Work.
3
Now funded by the National Institutes of
Health, the program evaluates the effectiveness of community health workers, particularly their
effectiveness in aiding communities of color. Training is an important part of the program.
Sessions for medical providers offer instruction on cultural humility and promoting
2
The network of scholars engaged in the Grand Challenge to Achieve Equal Opportunity and Justice also has
identified roles that social workers can play in addressing health disparities. For information on the network’s
efforts, see http://aaswsw.org/grand-challenges-initiative/12-challenges/achieve-equal-opportunity-and-justice/.
3
For additional information on REACH (Racial and Ethnic Approaches to Community Health)-Detroit, see
http://www.reachdetroit.org/about/index.php.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 7
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
communication skills so that communication is comprehensible. Training is also provided for
fitness instructors. Physical activity classes, walking clubs, and healthy eating programs are
offered in the community, with an eye to safety. Research has shown that REACH leads to
positive outcomes (Spencer et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2014).
Facilitating Successful Care Transitions
Care transitions are a prime target for social work intervention and can be improved in several
key ways. Transitions from one care setting to another, in particular transitioning home after a
hospitalization, often create complexities that can result in inadequate in-home care, hospital
readmissions, and high costs for health systems and payers. Every year, 2.6 million older adults
are readmitted to hospitals within 30 days of discharge, and these readmissions account for $26
million in Medicare spending each year (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2016). Just
over half of these transitioning patients had no physician contact after discharge (Jencks,
Williams, & Coleman, 2009). The ACA offers incentives to reduce unnecessary hospitalizations
and readmissions. Examples include value-based payments, the Hospital Readmission Reduction
Program, and the move toward bundled payments for episodes of care. In addition to spurring
significant research, these incentives have drawn attention to how payers, hospitals, and
community-based providers can ease care transitions, improve patient experiences, and reduce
unnecessary hospitalizations (admissions and readmissions).
Transitional care that supports individuals and families before and after a hospitalization is a
critically important factor in positive health outcomes. It is also important for preventive primary
care and for care-management efforts. Historically, the health-care and community services
available at transition points have been delivered through differing funding streams by disparate
professions with widely dissimilar training. Often, those delivering these services have not
“spoken the same language” nor held contractual obligations to foster collaborative relationships
with providers in other professions. Although ACA incentives have helped to address this
fragmentation, the changing dynamics make the system especially complicated for patients and
families to navigate on their own. Transitional-care social workers can serve as a critical hub for
the coordination of health and social services. They also can integrate a person-in-environment
perspective within health systems navigation and use client-centered interviewing skills to
support patients and families after a hospitalization.
The conceptualization of health as an individual experience occurring within social context has
led the social work profession to develop and participate in several transitional-care models that
address context. These are models of care in which medical professionals (doctors, nurses, and
physician assistants) collaborate closely with social workers, case managers, community care
workers, and others to engage needed services that support recovery and continuing health.
Several groups around the country have made pioneering efforts to integrate social workers into
transitional care efforts. The social-work-led Bridge Model of transitional care involves a
collaboration among an academic medical center, a health policy organization, and several
community-based Aging Network organizations. Bridge social workers combine care
coordination, case management, and patient engagement, using a comprehensive set of tools and
psychotherapeutic techniques to assess for gaps in care, improve self-efficacy, and enhance
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 8
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
patient activation (Boutwell, Johnson, & Watkins, 2016). Research on the model suggested an
association between Bridge services and increased primary-care follow-up appointments. In
addition, the model was associated with a 20% reduction in hospital readmissions among
Medicare beneficiaries who received home health care after hospital discharge. The Bridge
Model also supports individuals transitioning back to community treatment following an
inpatient psychiatric stay or a short-term rehabilitative stay. Continuing to identify ways to
integrate social work into transitional care efforts is imperative. Doing so will enable social
workers to increase the impact of these programs and will foster opportunities for partnerships
between community-based organizations and nearby health systems.
The Department of Social Work Services at Mount Sinai Hospital has had a long-standing
leadership role in addressing the social determinants of health and in facilitating successful care
transitions. The New York Academy of Medicine sections on Social Work and Health Care
Delivery recognized the current leadership team of Mount Sinai Hospital’s social work
department for the success of social work interventions in improving health outcomes and
reducing medical costs. The team has led multiple ACA-funded initiatives. Mount Sinai has four
social-work initiatives that address care transitions: care coordination in a ACO for Medicare
fee-for-service recipients, a CMS-funded program focusing on hospital discharge transitions to
prevent 30-day readmissions among Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries, an emergency
department project funded by the CMS Innovation Center, and a program funded through the
Robert Wood Johnson Foundation to improve health outcomes of women after childbirth.
CLOSING THE HEALTH GAP: SYSTEM-LEVEL STRATEGIES FOR SOCIAL WORK
Social workers can help close the health gap in the United States through six system-level
strategies: increasing social work leadership in health care, providing leadership training in
schools of social work and practice sites, enhancing public relations, embracing social
entrepreneurship, transdisciplinary and interprofessional education and training, and research.
Increasing Social Work Leadership in Health Care
In addition to fostering our professional capacity to improve health services and health outcomes,
the social work profession must continue to advocate broadly for the implementation of socially
oriented models of health care. True leadership in the transformation of health care systems
requires the profession to advance a vision for an effective health-care system that serves all
Americans and to offer concrete recommendations for how this can be achieved. That vision
should parallel the one elaborated through the ACA—a vision for the transformation of health
care from a crisis-oriented and medically grounded system to one that is focused on prevention,
well-being, and comprehensive care. Existing health-care systems are actively searching for
solutions to major cost and care challenges. Perhaps more than ever before, they are open to new
ideas and messages. This is a unique window of opportunity for social workers to actively set the
nation’s health-care agenda.
Crucially important decisions are being made by state health-insurance commissions and CMS:
Which services are covered at what price, and who will be paid to provide them. It is essential
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 9
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
that social work actively influence those decisions. At the national level, social work
representatives are needed on the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission and the Medicaid
and CHIP Payment and Access Commission. Representation on all leadership bodies associated
with the state-administered health exchanges is especially important. At the state level, the
profession should strive for representation on every state Medicaid Advisory Committee as well
as on mental-health and addiction service boards at state and county levels.
There is critical need to develop new social work leaders who possess the political sophistication to
engage in high-level professional advocacy. Unfortunately, a 2-year graduate education simply
does not allow the depth of skills training that such leadership requires. Accordingly, there is need
for leadership-development programs in health policy, programs similar to those offered in the
fields of medicine and public health. Such programs would train early- and mid-career
professionals who have excellent potential to provide health leadership in advocacy and health
management efforts at all levels of government. The programs would complement existing efforts
like the Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care’s annual Leadership Institute. The
Leadership Institute brings together experienced social work leaders and educators for an intensive,
interactive program designed to develop or enhance participants’ leadership knowledge and skills.
Health-policy leadership programs can also build on recent efforts by the Council on Social Work
Education and the National Association of Social Workers. Through the Social Work HEALS
(Social Work Health Care Education and Leadership Scholars) initiative, the two organizations are
collaborating to strengthen leadership training for health social work students.
Leadership Training in Schools and Practice Sites
Leadership training for individuals in schools of social work and in social work practice sites is a
precursor to effective advocacy concerning the value of social work in health care. The rarity of
such training seems to echo Richard Cabot’s comment about the importance of being systematic
rather than resting on the moral high ground. In this context, a systematic approach entails learning
how to engage with health powerbrokers in federal, state, and local government; the health care
industry; and funders of research and community demonstration projects. In addition, social work
faculty and students can foster leadership training within their academic institutions by working
closely with university and hospital administrators to identify opportunities. This type of training
should begin early. Partnerships with academic schools/colleges of communication, with
institutional or private marketing-and-communications departments, and with lobbying
organizations may offer additional ways to obtain such specialized leadership training. Moreover,
academic and industry leaders could provide especially helpful advice on ways to increase
awareness of social work and social determinants of health within the health care industry.
Recent national social work meetings have begun this process by assembling the best minds in
the field to grapple with how to promote the impact of social work on the nation’s health. New
energy to advance these goals was evident in the following recent events:
A 2014 meeting brought together experts in health social work and policy with
leaders from the Society for Social Work and Research, the Council on Social Work
Education, the National Association of Social Workers, the American Academy of
Social Work & Social Welfare, and the Society for Social Work Leadership in
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 10
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Health Care. Participants developed recommendations for ways to maximize social
work’s contributions to the implementation of the ACA (Andrews et al., 2015).
In 2015, Boston University’s School of Social Work created the Center for
Innovation in Social Work and Health, which has engaged 88 regional, national, and
global transdisciplinary experts in exploration of the impact of social work and health
in several domains, including education, policy, community, and global health.
4
In September 2016, Social Innovation for America’s Renewal: Ideas, Evidence,
Action, a conference held at Washington University in St. Louis, provided a forum to
examine the policy implications of each of the Grand Challenges for Social Work,
including the Grand Challenge to Close the Health Gap. Efforts to address that
challenge have focused on eradicating health inequalities.
5
Through its Leadership Academy, the National Association of Deans and Directors of
Schools of Social Work sponsored a November 2016 keynote address by Dr. Sally
Bachman, director of Boston University’s Center for Innovation in Social Work and
Health. Given in conjunction with the Council on Social Work Education’s meeting
in Atlanta, Georgia, the address outlined recent and emerging developments in health
policy.
In January 2017, approximately 50 academic and practice leaders in social work and
health attended the national Social Work and Health Convening 2017: State of
Research and Training, which was sponsored by the University of Chicago.
6
These events highlighted the opportunities for providing social work leaders with broad spectrum
leadership training that enables them to effectively advance a social-work health agenda as they
engage with interdisciplinary colleagues representing academic, industry, health-practice,
government, and funder interests. We must continue and expand upon such efforts.
Social work faculty, administrators, and senior practitioners in medical and health-care systems
will also benefit from training on communicating with the media about health care news that
requires a knowledgeable social work response. Rather than deferring to other health
professionals, social work faculty members and senior health practitioners must learn to speak
effectively about their knowledge and must form relationships with media representatives so that
they become go-to respondents when important health stories break. Social work writers can
raise awareness of critical health issues by contributing op-eds. These efforts all require training
that enables social workers to speak clearly with knowledge and confidence in professional
responses and outreach to the media. Likewise, training in public speaking will benefit social
4
For information on the Center for Innovation in Social Work & Health, see http://www.bu.edu/ssw/research/the-
center-for-innovation-in-social-work-and-health/.
5
Information on Social Innovation for America’s Renewal may be found at https://csd.wustl.edu/events
/ConferencesAndSymposia/Pages/Grand-Challenges-for-Social-Work-Policy-Conference.aspx.
6
Information on Social Work & Health Convening 2017 may be found at https://chas.uchicago.edu/page/social
-work-and-health-convening-2017.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 11
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
workers who give longer talks in public or academic settings covered by the media. A
willingness to make time for media interviews is also required in such settings.
Public Relations
Now is a critical time for the social work profession to articulate clearly its unique contributions
to improving health care and reducing the influence of adverse social determinants of health. The
profession should communicate to key policy makers the ways in social workers can help to
improve health care quality and value. The profession must go beyond identifying the roles and
activities that social workers execute well; it must link these interventions to address tangible,
specific needs within health care systems. Moreover, the profession must articulate clear,
consistent messages about how social workers can identify and meet these needs, especially as
part of transdisciplinary health-care teams. A language that communicates these roles across the
profession can be used effectively to convey the importance and value of social work to policy
makers, insurers, other health-care professionals, the public, and other essential stakeholders.
Key targets for advocacy include insurers and managed care organizations; federally qualified
health centers; hospitals; patient-centered medical homes; large, private physician practices; and
behavioral health programs. Social work leaders would benefit greatly from close collaboration
with marketing and public relations firms in deciding how to publicize the profession’s work to
improve health in America.
Social action, advocacy, and policy practice are at the core of the social work profession.
Although grassroots political efforts can be meaningful and effective, professional lobbying
organizations have greater influence on government in the long term, given their networks of
relationships, longevity, and nuanced understanding of the political system (Hamilton, 2014). In
presenting an analysis of data from the Senate Office of Public Relations, the Center for
Responsive Politics (2017) reports that companies, unions, and other organizations spent more
than $35.3 billion to lobby Congress and federal agencies during the last decade. During 2016
alone, a total of $3.32 billion was spent on lobbying entities of the federal government. The
National Association of Social Workers and the Council on Social Work Education spent
approximately .001% of that amount ($320,000) to promote the interests of the social work
profession (Center for Responsive Politics, 2017). In an era when lobbying has a profound
impact on the legislation and subsequent policies (De Figueiredo & Richter, 2014), it is
imperative for social work to increase its lobbying efforts, particularly at the federal level. New
and innovative entrepreneurial relationships have the potential to strengthen social work’s
lobbying power, enabling the profession to positively influence the nation’s health care systems.
To bring advocacy actions to scale, social work should develop a centralized lobbying institute
designed and staffed by professional lobbyists. The institute would train and coordinate cohorts
of social work leaders to influence lawmakers and federal agencies.
National attention to social determinants of health, and to the importance of addressing them in
health care settings, could also be raised through a forthcoming consensus study released by the
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Such studies and associated
workshops provide independent, objective analysis on health-related issues. Reports that result
from the consensus study process are well respected. They synthesize the state of affairs and
recommend actions to address the analyzed issue. Recent reports have covered such topics as the
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 12
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
obesity epidemic, underage drinking, adjustments to Medicare payments for social risk factors,
and reducing racial and ethnic disparities in access to health care.
A group of social work researchers, policymakers, and practitioners have proposed such a study
to examine the profession’s role in equipping the health-care delivery system to meet increasing
population health challenges. In January 2017, the National Academies and the National
Research Council approved Integrating Social Needs Care into the Delivery of Health Care to
Improve the Nation’s Health. When funding is secured and the study launched, the
interdisciplinary committee will gather information, deliberate on consensus findings, generate
recommendations, and write the report. When the report is released, the social work community
should identify ways to build upon it and to implement its recommendations. Social work should
partner in this effort with other stakeholders across the country, perhaps through a national
campaign similar to nursing’s Campaign for Action, which has built upon the consensus report
titled The Future of Nursing: Leading Change, Advancing Health (Institute of Medicine, 2011).
7
Social Entrepreneurship
Social entrepreneurship is another way for social workers to contribute to the dialogue on health
care delivery. In his seminal work, Dees (1998) posited that intention distinguishes social
entrepreneurship from other enterprises. A mission-driven social impact is pursued with the same
intensity, creativity, discipline, and focus associated with traditional business models. Social
entrepreneurial models go beyond the status quo, seeking new solutions with the potential for
transformative, sustainable change that will benefit society as well as traditionally vulnerable and
underserved populations (Dees, 1998; Peredo & McLean, 2006). The tenets of social
entrepreneurship offer great promise for social work, a profession driven by the values of social
justice and the inherent worth and dignity of the individual (National Association of Social
Workers, 2008).
Finding ways to maximize mission-driven social impact is especially important at times when the
demands for social work services increase but tenuous financial or political conditions preclude
innovation and co-opt social workers in the task of maintaining the viability of current health-care
systems. As a model for service delivery, social entrepreneurship enables social workers to
consider new and creative approaches to attaining mission objectives (Seelos & Mair, 2005;
Thompson, Alvy, & Lees, 2000). The Brides Project in Ann Arbor, Michigan, is an example of
such an approach. Social workers identified an untapped commercial market for recycled wedding
gowns and used profits to fund psychosocial support services for cancer patients.
8
As a paradigm for health social work, social entrepreneurship offers unprecedented opportunities
to foster new partnerships in mission-related investing (Germak & Singh, 2009; Linton, 2013;
Nandan, London, & Bent-Goodley, 2015), both investment from foundations (e.g., the Bill &
Melinda Gates Foundation’s vaccine innovation) and private sources (e.g., microfinance
opportunities in developing countries). Approaches to developing initiatives (Dees, Emerson, &
7
For information on the campaign, see http://campaignforaction.org/.
8
See http://www.thebridesproject.org.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 13
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Economy, 2001) and instructive case studies (Alvord, Brown, & Letts, 2004) are readily
available in the literature and on foundation web pages such as that of the Rockefeller
Foundation (Rockefeller Foundation, n.d.).
Transdisciplinary and Interprofessional Education and Training
As we have suggested, social workers have essential knowledge and skills to contribute to the
development of new models of care in health care systems that continue to embrace patient- and
family-centered care, collaborative practice, and attention to health inequities. Training within
interprofessional health teams enables social work practitioners to provide leadership within the
nation’s changing health care systems. Such training deliberately educates social work students
and practitioners in how to speak clearly and effectively about what the social work profession
brings to the table. It also enables the profession to specify how we can contribute to creating a
more patient-centered care that is responsive to the social and environmental contexts greatly
influencing health outcomes. Moreover, such training enables all members of interprofessional
medical teams to learn from each other about the integral and complimentary role each plays in
serving patients. The Institute of Medicine (2001; Levit, Balogh, Nass, & Ganz, 2013) and the
World Health Organization (1998, 2010) have recommended interprofessional education to
create graduates capable of joining and promoting team-based models of health care delivery.
Their recommendations parallel the Council on Social Work Education’s 2015 Educational
Policy and Accreditation Standards, which emphasize that social workers should develop skill in
relationship building, interprofessional collaboration, and communication. The standards also
emphasize the importance of the ability to apply multidisciplinary theory in provision of
assessments, interventions, and evaluations of outcomes. Social work can serve a critical role in
the development of these models.
Social workers provide leadership in the development of interprofessional education programs
that can improve health systems in several ways. Such training can enhance communication
between interdisciplinary team members and emphasize the unique and common roles, values,
ethical concerns of each profession (Jones & Phillips, 2016; Dauenhauer, Glose, & Watt, 2015).
Interprofessional education can build professional confidence and creativity; advance
professional equity and shared-decision making (Chan, Chi, Ching, & Lam, 2010; Nimmagadda
& Murphy, 2014; Sims, 2011). Interprofessional training can also enhance patient and
community care outcomes (Addy et al. 2015; Taylor et al., 2016; Terry et al., 2015). Social work
educators and practitioners must continue to lead the way in innovative interprofessional
education (Jones & Phillips, 2016). Recommendations for such social work leadership include
the following:
Introduce interprofessional education early in undergraduate social work programs,
develop collaborative interprofessional field experiences,
provide service-learning and shadowing experiences with other disciplines,
coteach and cocreate courses,
lead campus-wide initiatives,
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 14
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
bring together social work practitioners and educators to create learning experiences
that mirror current practice needs, and
evaluate these initiatives (Jones & Phillips, 2016; Taylor et al., 2016).
To demonstrate the value of social work in health systems, social work students at all levels also
must be trained in how to conduct transdisciplinary and translational research (Gehlert, Hall, &
Palinkas, 2017).
Social Work Research
Although several high-quality studies have documented how social workers can improve health
outcomes, particularly in the areas of care coordination and transition management, more work is
needed to comprehensively document social workers’ effectiveness in health care systems.
Researchers should develop and test entirely new models for improving health, models in which
social workers play key roles. At the individual level, interventions are needed to help patients
achieve their own goals for healthier living—particularly interventions that are sensitive and
responsive to the broader family, community, social, physical, and cultural contexts in which
patients live. At the community level, social workers have the opportunity to develop
interventions that foster understanding of community health needs, to work collaboratively with
communities in organizing for change, and to advocate for resources and environmental change
that can promote better community health.
The social work profession must demonstrate that it has the capacity to achieve good health
outcomes for patients while also bringing down health care costs. As team-based care and
bundled payments become more common in health care settings, social work researchers will be
challenged to conduct studies that demonstrate the contribution of social work interventions in
support of cost effectiveness and positive patient outcomes. Design and implementation of such
studies should be a priority within the social work research community. There is a need for the
profession to train and hire more health economists and health services researchers in schools of
social workthat is, investigators who can conduct and collaborate with social work students,
professionals, and faculty in these areas. Our outcomes and findings are more likely to have
impact for the health care field—and the many different kinds of health professionals working in
itif we initiate projects with researchers from these fields.
Greatly needed are social work practice-based research networks that promote the creation of
coordinated, community-based studies in multiple real-world settings (Gehlert, Walters, et al.,
2015). Widely used by other health professionals, practice-based research networks bring
together practitioners and researchers for the purpose of advancing research. Led by the Society
for Social Work and Research and other key stakeholders, including the National Association of
Social Workers, the Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care, and the Council on
Social Work Education, such a network could serve as a national coordinating body through
which to share resources, coordinate cross-state efforts, and develop a vision for enhancing the
profession’s role in shaping health care policy over time.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 15
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
CONCLUSION
Social work has an important role in strengthening health care systems and improving health
equity in the United States over the next decade. This paper complements two others released
as part of efforts to address the Grand Challenge to Close the Health Gap: Health Equity:
Eradicating Health Inequalities for Future Generations (Walters et al., 2016) and Reducing
and Preventing Alcohol Misuse and Its Consequences: A Grand Challenge for Social Work
(Begun et al., 2015).
9
It does so by elaborating a set of strategies for increasing health equity
within health care systems. Eradicating health inequities in the United States requires diverse
strategies that target the multiple settings in which disparities are created and perpetuated: in
neighborhoods, communities, and institutions, and within the health care system itself. Our
suggestions, along with other Grand Challenge efforts, provide a call to action for social work
practitioners, leaders, educators, and researchers. Through coordinated action, the profession
can close the nation’s health gap within the next decade.
9
For information on the Grand Challenge to Close the Health Gap, see http://aaswsw.org/grand-challenges-
initiative/12-challenges/close-the-health-gap/.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 16
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
REFERENCES
Addy, C. L., Browne, T., Blake, E. W., & Bailey, J. (2015). Enhancing interprofessional
education: Integrating public health and social work perspectives. American Journal of
Public Health, 105(1), S106–S108. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2014.302502
Adler, N. E., Glymour, M. M., & Fielding, J. (2016). Addressing social determinants of health
and health inequalities. JAMA, 316(16), 1641–1642. doi:10.1001/jama.2016.14058c
Allen, H. (2012). Is there a social worker in the house? Health care reform and the future of
medical social work. Health and Social Work, 37(3), 183–186. doi:10.1093/hsw/hls021
Alley, D. E., Asomugha, C. N., Conway, P. H., & Sanghavi, D. M. (2016). Accountable health
communitiesaddressing social needs through Medicare and Medicaid. New England
Journal of Medicine, 374(1), 8–11. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1512532
Alvord, S. H., Brown, L. D., & Letts, C. W. (2004). Social entrepreneurship and societal
transformation: An exploratory study. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 40(3), 260–
282. doi:10.1177/0021886304266847
Andrews, C., Browne, T., Allen, H., Coffey, D. S., Gehlert, S., Golden, R., … Woomer, E.
(2015). Social work and the Affordable Care Act: Maximizing the profession’s role in health
reform. Retrieved from University of South Carolina, College of Social Work website: http://
cosw.sc.edu/images/pdfs/swaca/swaca-FINAL-04-20-2015.pdf
Bachman, S.S. (2016, November). Current health policy developments. Address given at the
Leadership Academy of the National Association of Deans and Directors of Schools of
Social Work, Council on Social Work Education Annual Program Meeting, Atlanta, GA.
Begun, A. L., Clapp, J. D., & The Alcohol Misuse Grand Challenge Collective. (2015). Preventing
and reducing alcohol misuse and its consequences: A grand challenge for social work (Grand
Challenges for Social Work initiative Working Paper No. 14). Retrieved from American
Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare website: http://aaswsw.org/wp-content/uploads
/2015/12/WP14-with-cover.pdf
Bird, J. D. P., & Voisin, D. R. (2011). A conceptual model of HIV disclosure in casual sexual
encounters among men who have sex with men. Journal of Health Psychology, 16(2), 365–
373. doi:10.1177/1359105310379064
Boutwell, A. E., Johnson, M. B., & Watkins, R. (2016). Analysis of a social work–based model
of transitional care to reduce hospital readmissions: Preliminary data. Journal of the
American Geriatrics Society, 64(5), 1104–1107. doi:10.1111/jgs.14086
Braveman, P., & Gottlieb, L. (2014). The social determinants of health: It’s time to consider the
causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129(1, Suppl. 2), 19–31. doi:10.1177/0033354
9141291S206
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 17
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Browne, T. (2011). The relationship between social networks and pathways to kidney transplant
parity: Evidence from black Americans in Chicago. Social Science & Medicine, 73(5), 663–
667. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.06.031
Burg, M. A., Zebrack, B., Walsh, K., Maramaldi, P., Lim, J.-W., Smolinski, K. M., & Lawson,
K. (2010). Barriers to accessing quality health care for cancer patients: A survey of members
of the Association of Oncology Social Work. Social Work in Health Care, 49(1), 38–52.
doi:10.1080/00981380903018470
Cabot, R. C. (1911). Social service work in hospitals. Chicago Medical Recorder, 33, 307–321.
Cabot, R.C. (1912). Humanizing the hospitals. In S. Breckenridge (Ed.), The child in the city: A
series of papers presented at the conferences held during the Chicago Child Welfare Exhibit
(pp. 41–52). Chicago, IL: Chicago School of Civics and Philanthropy.
Cabot, R.C. (1915). Social service and the art of healing. New York, NY: Moffat, Yard and Co.
Cannon, I. M. (1952). On the social frontier of medicine: Pioneering in medical social service.
Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Center for Responsive Politics. (2017). Lobbying database. Retrieved from https://www
.opensecrets.org/lobby/
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2013). CDC health disparities and inequalities
report—United States, 2013. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 62(3, Suppl.).
Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/pdf/other/su6203.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016, February 29). CDC programs addressing
social determinants of health. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants
/cdcprograms/index.htm
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2017). Social determinants of health: Know what
affects health. Retrieved from https://www.cdc.gov/socialdeterminants/
Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2016). Community-based care transitions program.
Retrieved from https://innovation.cms.gov/initiatives/CCTP/
Chan, E. A., Chi, S. P. M., Ching, S., & Lam, S. K. S. (2010). Interprofessional education: The
interface of nursing and social work. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 19(1–2), 168–176. doi:
10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02854.x
Congressional Budget Office. (2017a, May 24). H.R. 1628: American Health Care Act of 2017;
as passed by the House of Representatives on May 4, 2017 (Congressional Budget Office
cost estimate). Retreived from https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018
/costestimate/hr1628aspassed.pdf
Congressional Budget Office. (2017b, June 26). H.R. 1628: Better Care Reconciliation Act of
2017; an amendment in the nature of a substitute [LYN17343] as posted on the website of the
Senate Committee on the Budget on June 26, 2017 (Congressional Budget Office cost
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 18
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
estimate). Retreived from https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress-2017-2018
/costestimate/52849-hr1628senate.pdf
Congressional Budget Office. (2017c, July 19). H.R. 1628: Obamacare Repeal Reconciliation
Act of 2017; an amendment in the nature of a substitute [LYN17479] as posted on the
website of the Senate Committee on the Budget on July 19, 2017 (Congressional Budget
Office cost estimate). Retreived from https://www.cbo.gov/system/files/115th-congress
-2017-2018/costestimate/52939-hr1628amendment.pdf
Council on Social Work Education, Commission on Accreditation and Commission on
Educational Policy. (2015). 2015 educational policy and accreditation standards for
baccalaureate and master’s social work programs. Retrieved from https://www.cswe
.org/getattachment/Accreditation/Accreditation-Process/2015-EPAS/2015EPAS_Web
_FINAL.pdf.aspx
Dauenhauer, J. A., Glose, S., & Watt, C. (2015). Design, delivery, and outcomes from an
interprofessional fall prevention course. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 36(3), 278–
301. doi:10.1080/02701960.2015.1031891
Dees, J. G. (1998). The meaning of social entrepreneurship [Working paper]. Kansas City, MO:
Kauffman Center for Entrepreneurial Leadership.
Dees, J. G., Emerson, J., & Economy, P. (2001). Enterprising nonprofits: A toolkit for social
entrepreneurs. New York, NY: Wiley.
De Figueiredo, J. M., & Richter, B. K. (2014). Advancing the empirical research on lobbying.
Annual Review of Political Science, 17, 163–185. doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-100711
-135308
Ell, K., Katon, W., Lee, P.-J., Kapetanovic, S., Guterman, J., Xie, B., & Chou, C.-P. (2012).
Depressive symptom deterioration among predominantly Hispanic diabetes patients in safety
net care. Psychosomatics, 53(4), 347–355. doi:10.1016/j.psym.2011.12.009
Ell, K., Katon, W., Xie, B., Lee, P.J., Kapetanovic, S., Guterman, J., & Chou, C.-P. (2010).
Collaborative care management of major depression among low-income, predominantly
Hispanic subjects with diabetes: A randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 33(4), 706–
713. doi:10.2337/dc09-1711
Ell, K., Katon, W., Xie, B., Lee, P.-J., Kapetanovic, S., Guterman, J., & Chou, C.-P. (2011). One-
year postcollaborative depression care trial outcomes among predominantly Hispanic diabetes
safety net patients. General Hospital Psychiatry, 33(5), 436442. doi:10.1016/j.genhosppsych
.2011.05.018
Gehlert, S., & Coleman, R. (2010). Using community-based participatory research to ameliorate
cancer disparities. Health & Social Work, 35(4), 302–309. doi:10.1093/hsw/35.4.302
Gehlert, S., Collins, S., Golden, R., & Horn, P. (2015). Social work participation in accountable
care organizations under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Health & Social
Work, 40(4), e142–e147. doi:10.1093/hsw/hlv054
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 19
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
Gehlert, S., Hall, K. L., & Palinkas, L. A. (2017). Preparing our next-generation scientific
workforce to address the Grand Challenges for Social Work. Journal of the Society for Social
Work & Research, 8(1), 119–136. doi:10.1086/690659
Gehlert, S., Sohmer, D., Sacks, T., Mininger, C., McClintock, M., & Olopade, O. (2008).
Targeting health disparities: A model linking upstream determinants to downstream
interventions. Health Affairs, 27(2), 339–349. doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.2.339
Gehlert, S., Walters, K., Uehara, E., & Lawlor, E. (2015). The case for a national health social
work practice–based research network in addressing health equity. Health & Social Work,
40(4), 253–255. doi:10.1093/hsw/hlv060
Germak, A. J., & Singh, K. K. (2009). Social entrepreneurship: Changing the way social workers
do business. Administration in Social Work, 34(1), 79–95. doi:10.1080/03643100903432974
Hamilton, L. (2014). What makes a strong lobbyist. Retrieved from Center on Congress at
Indiana University website: http://centeroncongress.org/what-makes-strong-lobbyist
Holmes, J. H., Lehman, A., Hade, E., Ferketich, A. K., Gehlert, S., Rauscher, G. H., Bird, C. E.
(2008). Challenges for multilevel health disparities research in a transdisciplinary environment.
American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35(2, Suppl.), S182S192. doi:10.1016/j.amepre
.2008.05.019
Holt-Lunstad, J., & Smith, T. B. (2016). Loneliness and social isolation as risk factors for CVD:
Implications for evidence-based patient care and scientific inquiry. Heart, 102(13), 987–989.
doi:10.1136/heartjnl-2015-309242
Institute of Medicine. (2001). Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st
century [Report]. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
Institute of Medicine. (2011). The future of nursing: Leading change, advancing health [Report].
Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Jencks, S. F., Williams, M. V., & Coleman, E. A. (2009). Rehospitalizations among patients in
the Medicare fee-for-service program. New England Journal of Medicine, 360(14), 1418–
1428. doi:10.1056/NEJMsa0803563
Jones, B., & Phillips, F. (2016). Social work and interprofessional education in health care: A
call for continued leadership. Journal of Social Work Education, 52(1), 18–29. doi:10.1080
/10437797.2016.1112629
Levit, L. A., Balogh, E. P., Nass, S. J., & Ganz, P. A. (2013). Delivering high-quality cancer care:
Charting a new course for a system in crisis. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Linton, K. F. (2013). Developing a social enterprise as a social worker. Administration in Social
Work, 37(5), 458–470. doi:10.1080/03643107.2013.828000
Markossian, T. W., Darnell, J. S., & Calhoun, E. A. (2012). Follow-up and timeliness after an
abnormal cancer screening among underserved, urban women in a patient navigation
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 20
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
program. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention, 21(10), 1691–1700. doi:10
.1158/1055-9965.EPI-12-0535
Marrazzo, J. M., Del Rio, C., Holtgrave, D. R., Cohen, M. S., Kalichman, S. C., Mayer, K. H.,
… Benson, C. A. (2014). HIV prevention in clinical care settings: 2014 recommendations of
the International Antiviral SocietyUSA Panel. JAMA, 312(4), 390–409. doi:10.1001/jama
.2014.7999
Nandan, M., London, M., & Bent-Goodley, T. (2015). Social workers as social change agents: Social
innovation, social intrapreneurship, and social entrepreneurship. Human Service Organizations:
Management, Leadership & Governance, 39(1), 3856. doi:10.1080/23303131.2014.955236
National Association of Social Workers. (2008). Code of ethics of the National Association of
Social Workers. Washington, DC: Author.
National Association of Social Workers. (2016). NASW standards for social work practice in
health care settings. Washington, DC: Author.
National Research Council & Institute of Medicine. (2013). US health in international
perspective: Shorter lives, poorer health. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
Newman, L., Baum, F., Javanparast, S., O’Rourke, K., & Carlon, L. (2015). Addressing social
determinants of health inequities through settings: a rapid review. Health Promotion
International, 30( 2), ii126–ii143. doi:10.1093/heapro/dav054
Nimmagadda, J., & Murphy, J. I. (2014). Using simulations to enhance interprofessional
competencies for social work and nursing students. Social Work Education, 33(4), 539–548.
doi:10.1080/02615479.2013.877128
Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (n.d.). Social determinants of health.
Retrieved from HealthyPeople.gov website: https://www.healthypeople.gov/2020/topics
-objectives/topic/social-determinants-of-health
Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act of 2010, Pub. L. No. 111-148, 124 Stat. 119 (2012).
Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept.
Journal of World Business, 41(1), 56–65. doi:10.1016/j.jwb.2005.10.007
Rockefeller Foundation. (n.d.). Mission-related investing. Retrieved from https://www
.rockefellerfoundation.org/our-work/initiatives/mission-related-investing/
Seelos, C., & Mair, J. (2005). Social entrepreneurship: Creating new business models to serve
the poor. Business Horizons, 48(3), 241–246. doi:10.1016/j.bushor.2004.11.006
Sims, D. (2011). Achieving collaborative competence through interprofessional education.
Lessons learned from joint training in learning disability nursing and social work. Social
Work Education, 30(1), 98–112. doi:10.1080/02615471003748056
Spencer, M. S., Hawkins, J., Espitia, N. R., Sinco, B., Jennings, T., Lewis, C., … Kieffer, E.
(2013). Influence of a community health worker intervention on mental health outcomes
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 21
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
among low-income Latino and African American adults with Type 2 diabetes. Race and
Social Problems, 5(2), 137–146. doi:10.1007/s12552-013-9098-6
Tang, T. S., Funnell, M., Sinco, B., Piatt, G., Palmisano, G., Spencer, M. S., … Heisler, M.
(2014). Comparative effectiveness of peer leaders and community health workers in diabetes
self-management support: Results of a randomized controlled trial. Diabetes Care, 37(6),
1525–1534. doi:10.2337/dc13-2161
Taylor, L. D., Coffey, D. S., & Kashner, T. M. (2016). Interprofessional education of health
professionals: Social workers should lead the way. Health & Social Work, 41(1), 5–8. doi:
10.1093/hsw/hlv082
Tejeda, S., Darnell, J. S., Cho, Y. I., Stolley, M. R., Markossian, T. W., & Calhoun, E. A. (2013).
Patient barriers to follow-up care for breast and cervical cancer abnormalities. Journal of
Womens Health, 22(6), 507–517. doi:10.1089/jwh.2012.3590
Terry, J., Raithby, M., Cutter, J., & Murphy, F. (2015). A menu for learning: A World Café
approach for user involvement and inter-professional learning on mental health. Social Work
Education, 34(4), 437–458. doi:10.1080/02615479.2015.1031651
Thompson, J., Alvy, G., & Lees, A. (2000). Social entrepreneurship – a new look at the people
and the potential. Management Decision, 38(5), 328–338. doi:10.1108/00251740010340517
Valtorta, N. K., Kanaan, M., Gilbody, S., Ronzi, S., & Hanratty, B. (2016). Loneliness and social
isolation as risk factors for coronary heart disease and stroke: Systematic review and meta-
analysis of longitudinal observational studies. Heart, 102(13), 1009–1016. doi:10.1136
/heartjnl-2015-308790
Voisin, D. R., Bird, J. D. P., Shiu, C.-S., & Krieger, C. (2013). “It’s crazy being a Black, gay
youth.” Getting information about HIV prevention: A pilot study. Journal of Adolescence,
36(1), 111–119. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2012.09.009
Walters, K. L., Spencer, M. S., Smukler, M., Allen, H. L., Andrews, C., Browne, T., ... Uehara,
E. (2016). Health equity: Eradicating health inequalities for future generations (Grand
Challenges for Social Work initiative Working Paper No. 19). Retrieved from American
Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare website: http://aaswsw.org/wp-content/uploads
/2016/01/WP19-with-cover2.pdf
Werner-Lin, A., McCoyd, J. L. M., Doyle, M. H., & Gehlert, S. J. (2016). Leadership, literacy,
and translational expertise in genomics: Challenges and opportunities for social work. Health
& Social Work, 41(3), e52–e59. doi:10.1093/hsw/hlw022
Wheeler, D. P. (2011). Advancing HIV/AIDS domestic agenda: Social work and community
health workers unite. Health & Social Work, 36(2), 157–158. doi:10.1093/hsw/36.2.157
World Health Organization. (1998). The world health report 1998 – Life in the 21st century: A
vision for all. Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 22
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
World Health Organization. (2010). Framework for action on interprofessional education and
collaborative practice (Report No. WHO/HRH/HPN/10.3). Geneva, Switzerland: Author.
Xu, J., Murphy, S. L., Kochanek, K. D., & Arias, E. (2016, December). Mortality in the United
States, 2015 (NCHS Data Brief No. 267). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health
Statistics.
Young, J. L., Werner-Lin, A., Mueller, R., Hoskins, L., Epstein, N., & Greene, M. H. (2017).
Longitudinal cancer risk management trajectories of BRCA1/2 mutation-positive reproductive-
age women. Journal of Psychosocial Oncology, doi:10.1080/07347332.2017.1292574
ABOUT THE AUTHORS
TERI BROWNE,
10
is Associate Professor in the University of South Carolina College of Social Work.
S
ARAH GEHLERT is Dean of the University of South Carolina School of Social Work and President of the
American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare.
C
HRISTINA M. ANDREWS is Assistant Professor in the University of South Carolina College of Social Work.
B
RADLEY J. ZEBRACK is Professor in the University of Michigan School of Social Work.
V
IRGINIA N. WALTHER is Assistant Professor in the departments of Preventive Medicine, Obstetrics,
Gynecology and Reproductive Science, and Pediatrics at Mount Sinai Hospital.
G
AIL STEKETEE is Professor in the Boston University School of Social Work and Vice President of the
American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare.
P
ETER MARAMALDI is Professor in the Simmons College School of Social Work and Adjunct Professor in
the T. H. Chan School of Public Health at Harvard University.
B
ARBARA L. JONES is University Distinguished Teaching Professor in the Steve Hicks School of Social
Work and Co-Director of the Institute for Collaborative Health Research and Practice at the University of
Texas at Austin.
R
OBYN L. GOLDEN is Professor in the Department of Health Systems Management and Director of Health
Population Health and Aging at Rush University Medical Center.
B
ONNIE EWALD, is Project Coordinator with the Health and Aging Department at Rush University
Medical Center.
S
USAN R. BERNSTEIN is Assistant Professor in Environmental Medicine & Public Health at Mount
Sinai Hospital.
A
UDREY L. BEGUN is Professor in the Ohio State University College of Social Work.
HEIDI L. ALLEN is Associate Professor in the Columbia University School of Social Work.
S
USAN GUTH is Board Director with the Society for Social Work Leadership in Health Care.
A
BIGAIL ROSS is Assistant Professor in the Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service.
10
Corresponding author. Email: browne@sc.edu.
STRENGTHENING HEALTH CARE SYSTEMS: BETTER HEALTH ACROSS AMERICA 23
Grand Challenges for Social Work initiative
Working Paper
MEGAN MOORE is Assistant Professor in the University of Washington School of Social Work.
J
OSEPH R. MERIGHI is Associate Professor in the University of Minnesota School of Social Work.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Sandra Audia Little at the University of Maryland School of Social Work designed the cover. Chris
Leiker at Washington University’s Center for Social Development provided editorial support.
SUGGESTED CITATION
Browne, T., Gehlert, S., Andrews, C. M., Zebrack, B. J., Walther, V. N., Steketee, G., Merighi, J. R.
(2017). Strengthening health care systems: Better health across America (Grand Challenges for Social Work
initiative Working Paper No. 22). Cleveland, OH: American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare.
CONTACT
American Academy of Social Work & Social Welfare
Sarah Christa Butts, Executive Director
academy@aaswsw.org