ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
This work was supported by the Insurance Institute for Highway
Safety. The authors thank Anastasios Markitsis for his assistance
with the data processing.
Authors’ affiliations
.....................
C M Farmer, A F Williams, Insurance Institute for Highway Safety,
Arlington, Virginia, USA
REFERENCES
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. Traffic safety facts, 2002.
Report No DOT-HS-809-620. Washington, DC: US Department of
Transportation, 2004.
2 Cerrelli EC. Crash, injury, and fatality rates by time of day and day of week.
Report No DOT-HS-808-194. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic
Safety Administration, 1995.
3 Arnold R, Cerrelli EC. Holiday effect on traffic fatalities. Report No DOT-HS-
807-115. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
1987.
4 Harms PL. Driver-following studies on the M4 motorway during a holiday
and a normal weekend in 1966. Report No RRL-LR136. Crowthorne,
Berkshire, UK: Road Research Laboratory, 1968.
5 National Safety Council. Independence Day holiday period traffic fatality
estimate, 2003. Itasca, IL: National Safety Council, 2003. Available at:
http://www.nsc.org/public/issues/indday03.doc (accessed 28 October
2003).
6 Subramanian R. Transitioning to multiple imputation: a new method to impute
missing blood alcohol concentration (BAC) values in FARS. Report No
DOT-HS-809-403. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety
Administration, 2002.
7 Federal Highway Administration. Traffic volume trends. Washington, DC,
2003. Available at: http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/ohim/tvtw/tvtpage.htm
(accessed 29 October 2003).
8 Agent KR, Green ER, Langley RE. Evaluation of Kentucky’s ‘‘You drink and
drive, you lose’’ campaign. Report No KTC-02-28. Lexington, KY: Kentucky
Transportation Center, 2002.
9 Ross HL. Britain’s Christmas crusade against drinking and driving. J Stud
Alcohol 1987;48:476–82.
10 Jenni KE, Loewenstein G. Explaining the ‘‘identifiable victim effect’’. J Risk
Uncertain 1997;14:235–57.
11 Douglas M. Risk acceptability according to the social sciences. New York:
Russell Sage Foundation, 1985.
12 Williams AF, Paek NN, Lund AK. Factors that drivers say motivate safe driving
practices. J Safety Res 1995;26:119–24.
13 Institute of Medicine. Reducing the burden of injury. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press, 1999.
14 Tingvall C, Haworth N. Vision Zero: an ethical approach to safety and
mobility. Paper presented to the 6th Institute of Transportation Engineers
international conference on road safety and traffic enforcement: beyond
2000. Melbourne: 6–7 September, 19 99. Available at: http://
www.general.monash.edu.au/muarc/viszero.htm (accessed 28 April 2004).
15 Koornstra M, Lynam D, Nilsson G, et al. SUNflower: a comparative study of
the development of road safety in Sweden, the United Kingdom, and the
Netherlands. Leidschendam, Netherlands: SWOV Institute for Road Safety
Research, 2002.
16 Peden M, Scurfield R, Sleet D, et al, eds. The world report on road traffic injury
prevention. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2004.
17 Shankar U. Recent trends in fatal motorcycle crashes. Report No DOT-HS-
809-271. Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration,
2001.
LACUNAE ...........................................................................................................
Clothing related burn injuries to children
T
he first full year of data from the US CPSC National Burn Center Reporting System,
published in October, showed that gasoline and other flammable liquids are frequently
involved in clothing related burns to children. In a new report, CPSC staff reviewed 209
children’s clothing burn injury reports received from March 2003 through June 2004 and
found that more than one half involved gasoline or other flammable liquids. Developed in
cooperation with the American Burn Association and Shriners Hospitals for Children, the
CPSC’s National Burn Center Reporting System collects comprehensive reports on clothing
related burns to children under age 15 from the 105 burn centers that treat children. These
incidents involve the ignition, melting, or smouldering of clothing worn by children. To
support this effort, the National Association of State Fire Marshals works cooperatively with
CPSC to retrieve and preserve children’s clothing involved in burn injuries—an action that
greatly enhances the investigative process. Garments collected by fire officials are forwarded
to CPSC headquarters for inspection. At the suggestion of the NASFM, a committee
consisting of the National Volunteer Fire Council, National Fire Protection Association, the
International Association of Fire Chiefs, and NASFM developed a protocol for use by ‘‘first
responders’’ across the country. For each incident reported, the burn center provides CPSC
with preliminary information on the incident. A CPSC investigator is assigned to the case to
conduct an in-depth investigation, interviewing the victim when possible, as well as parents,
fire officials, and medical personnel. All reports are reviewed and maintained in CPSC’s
epidemiological databases. The report, which can be downloaded from http://www.cpsc.gov/
cpscpub/prerel/prhtml05/05028.pdf, highlights that of the 213 victims, 179 were injured
while wearing daywear. No incidents appear to have involved tight fitting children’s
sleepwear or infant garments sized 9 months or smaller. The most frequent ignition source
was an outdoor fire, involved in 62 of the 209 incidents, followed by lighters in 37 of the
incidents. More than one half (107) of the 209 incidents involved flammable liquids. Boys,
ages 10 to 14, comprised most of the victims. Many of these incidents were also associated
with outdoor fires. Gasoline was the most frequently reported flammable liquid involved in
these incidents.
Temporal factors in motor vehicle crash deaths 23
www.injuryprevention.com